Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic? - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35074459

about

Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections Home-based versus clinic-based management strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review.Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients' experiences.Advances in sampling and screening for chlamydia.Instant on-paper protein digestion during blood spot sampling.

P2860

Q24186946-1CCDF5D1-1F23-475A-946C-9D2E9E2E003B Q24193987-F0225E1B-F681-45D0-BAEE-87D4899A466D Q33982195-AFECDAB5-F583-47F2-AEB5-6FA016FBFD15 Q34621591-3855AB49-1856-4016-80F9-B834DF7C4807 Q35535717-B698257E-F4C3-4E17-A0B3-F48330B16945 Q37846961-C9F81622-8DB8-4F60-9FC7-D7A88666E9C6 Q47818503-E23CDE91-D1F9-46FD-979F-C5D7E0B299D2

P2860

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35074459

description

2011 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2011 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2011 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2011年の論文

@ja

2011年論文

@yue

2011年論文

@zh-hant

2011年論文

@zh-hk

2011年論文

@zh-mo

2011年論文

@zh-tw

2011年论文

@wuu

name

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@ast

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@en

type

label

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@ast

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@en

prefLabel

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@ast

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@en

P1433

Q35074459-93BA08C3-FB40-48CC-BD0C-F61772FB8E4C

P1476

Q35074459-7CE65B1B-5B88-4C2A-8784-E43195A24C78

P2093

Q35074459-609B5F5B-0AB8-4550-8EF0-A5335C6A01EE

Q35074459-A500CF53-15B2-4E30-B0C5-490B67E116FA

Q35074459-D810A70F-4942-4D73-9BED-A7D05B113CD2

Q35074459-E1137DE8-8EDA-442A-A70A-DFDEC417BC70

P2860

Q35074459-0451FED7-D6B5-4E65-A335-DD75EAF968A3

Q35074459-0DF92307-9C9B-4369-8F18-88A709DDB165

Q35074459-207659AD-A947-4785-9FDD-D0F646C30B91

Q35074459-21D51068-0BFE-446A-8627-4981C98427E8

Q35074459-21E1967E-96D9-45F3-B7EC-4E4E6D687D6E

Q35074459-21E4390A-E4BF-4B5A-9942-EC656B091DF9

Q35074459-44F6D53A-F308-44CC-B543-E2799095DD20

Q35074459-536FDD4B-E57D-42FF-87B9-5B48DBC61028

Q35074459-542B246D-5C97-48E0-BDD8-0823A61D0336

Q35074459-55D08E2C-D8B7-40E8-B1BF-2818B2920958

P304

Q35074459-C9D5EC4F-14A3-4E96-9747-5FC3CDE5F295

P31

Q35074459-3AE67B5B-7EF9-42B9-9EA9-22CCFE1D70E5

Q35074459-4ad3ffbc-1331-4af6-9c25-cf92250bf246

P356

Q35074459-FB71F550-135C-4E4C-A69F-3A7631911303

P433

Q35074459-52952E56-B56B-4B9D-B7BC-9B23F9E0B231

P478

Q35074459-5B961978-88AF-4B4F-A4D2-111597645C11

P577

Q35074459-2E0D1219-1EAF-49D4-86EC-197F43C43BD8

P698

Q35074459-BDCB8095-517A-48A2-A409-75E587C9CB32

P921

Q35074459-34831756-732E-45A7-9806-02F54D7D0684

Q35074459-603C4DE2-1B9A-49C9-97AF-A06581A0943C

P932

Q35074459-649E483C-B52B-4D38-910D-749D7E925E8C

P356

QCO.0B013E32834204A8

P1433

Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

P1476

Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

@en

P2093

Anna S Graseck

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gina M Secura

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jeffrey F Peipert

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Shirley L Shih

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction.

Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study.

Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study

Home screening compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections

Home compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections: a randomized controlled trial.

Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.

Managing partners of people diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis: a comparison of two partner testing methods.

The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design

Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.

Cost comparisons between home- and clinic-based testing for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women.

P304

78-84

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1097/QCO.0B013E32834204A8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

24

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-02-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

21124216

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

sexual transmission

P932

3125396

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string