Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
about
Extended lymph node dissection in robotic radical prostatectomy: Current statusCurrent technique and results for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomySingle Positive Lymph Node Prostate Cancer Can Be Treated Surgically without RecurrenceDetection of Lymph Node Metastases with SERRS Nanoparticles.High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.Pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with elevated risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy: comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures.Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons.Suboptimal use of pelvic lymph node dissection: Differences in guideline adherence between robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.National trends and differences in morbidity among surgical approaches for radical prostatectomy in Germany.Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.Robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency of nodal metastases and oncological outcomes.Elective pelvic versus prostate bed-only salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.Extended lymph node dissection for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: do we have all the evidence?Extended lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lymph node yield and distribution of metastases.Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.External validation of the updated Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended lymph node dissection.How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?Sentinel lymph node dissection in more than 1200 prostate cancer cases: rate and prediction of lymph node involvement depending on preoperative tumor characteristics.Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy and perioperative outcomes of limited versus extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.Current trends in patient enrollment for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Belgium.Yonsei nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in Asian men with prostate cancer during robotic era.Extended vs standard lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a propensity-score-matching analysis.
P2860
Q26749073-3F4CFEF6-D7D0-4E09-9603-55D4B7167C8AQ28075727-6490A67C-52E4-46A8-AF27-70A34A8F98F4Q28551111-F2546F6B-54D4-4F78-869F-029AD3AB7DE8Q30373357-05519226-BBA8-4A2B-86D1-79864FECA2B1Q35869811-18E3AEBF-C02D-4989-9F06-70762E243784Q35975705-8B3452F9-F06A-46E8-B0AF-1D97351212B8Q36748537-E980A7BB-710E-4536-9E97-BD9117DC0A86Q37139332-CF4DFF6F-D908-4CF1-BABC-6FDC55CF864EQ37415787-81E09871-5DB4-4461-A38E-EE12970A5C65Q38787880-FFA9F282-E7E1-4DC9-844F-B2921750F1D8Q38946078-13EA64B2-CF5E-4AEA-9C8D-114046A5B9F2Q38956504-DA97BFCF-A53C-4E57-A64D-9FAC39D4C10FQ40212236-7651F1C8-EFE2-40B8-826E-656FEB525C38Q41379707-28CDE0F0-DF6B-4A26-96F6-A15D2300CFCAQ41599603-D631FCB7-EB32-4982-A2CD-D4D0C8F34BEEQ41819923-6B180978-7F25-4F80-AC1B-978B72D0CA37Q42030440-79FECFBF-C558-44D9-B10E-DA613739327AQ42692893-3CBAC46E-79EC-494D-B709-647B4534CFA5Q44459806-BC40F422-EA73-422A-8E60-06F578D44736Q45938587-8D6EECC7-4095-44B3-A594-09C679EE006AQ46783216-8AE2A950-9DEC-4A41-8078-25C291B12F89Q47326043-8C58FC04-D4BB-400A-920A-53A726825315Q48029204-DAE3A63C-4CD1-445F-9BBD-DC45803BCA4BQ51167329-52F3FE9D-44D9-4AC4-9E78-9845C9D4BD2BQ51273408-5199563C-929C-4364-93DD-75F20030D22B
P2860
Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@ast
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@en
type
label
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@ast
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@en
prefLabel
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@ast
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Temporal trends and predictors ...... nvasive radical prostatectomy.
@en
P2093
Andrew H Feifer
Brian Denton
David S Yee
Elena B Elkin
James A Eastham
Lindsay Jacks
Peter T Scardino
Vincent P Laudone
William T Lowrance
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/CNCR.25981
P407
P577
2011-03-15T00:00:00Z