Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
about
Engaging Patients and Caregivers Managing Rare Diseases to Improve the Methods of Clinical Guideline Development: A Research Protocol.Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: Systematic review of the current evidence on how users handle the 2 overall assessmentsAdherence to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guidelines to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy--a representative sample survey in Germany.Quality of Cancer Surveillance Clinical Practice Guidelines: Specificity and Consistency of Recommendations.Lack of existing guidelines for a large group of patients in Sweden: a national survey across the acute surgical care delivery chain.A comparison of the localization of rectal carcinomas according to the general rules of the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma (JCCRC) and Western guidelines.
P2860
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@ast
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@en
type
label
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@ast
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@en
prefLabel
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@ast
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Critical evaluation of the scientific content in clinical practice guidelines.
@en
P2093
Samantha Hendren
Sandra L Wong
Scott E Regenbogen
Zaid M Abdelsattar
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/CNCR.29124
P407
P577
2014-11-06T00:00:00Z