Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35126277

about

Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography Health and life insurance as an alternative to malpractice tort law Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.Feasibility and satisfaction with a tailored web-based audit intervention for recalibrating radiologists' thresholds for conducting additional work-up.Using a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall.Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: is overdiagnosis an issue for radiologists?Predictors of radiologists' perceived risk of malpractice lawsuits in breast imaging Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.Medical malpractice in connecticut: defensive medicine, real problem or a red herring - example of assessment of quality outcomes variables.Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway.Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. Health care Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography.The future of mammography: radiology residents' experiences, attitudes, and opinions.Geographic access and the use of screening mammography.Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.Association between physician supply, local practice norms, and outpatient visit rates.Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.Utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in two health care systems: assessment with the 2009 ACCF/ASNC/AHA appropriateness use criteria.Malpractice claims related to musculoskeletal imaging. Incidence and anatomical location of lesions.Surgical management of ulcerative colitis: a comparison of Canadian and American colorectal surgeons Breast cancer screening in England and the United States: a comparison of provision and utilisation.Co-prescribing naloxone does not increase liability risk.The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.Increasing value by increasing volume: call for changes in US breast cancer screening practices.Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices: primary care physicians in the United States.Improvising Prescription: Evidence from the Emergency Room

P2860

Q29540997-451A5938-146A-4008-83E8-566E72610092 Q33594880-29B5D17D-1FA0-436D-80A9-27A475E49A80 Q33667241-1BF612F0-054E-4F0C-B618-A19B775D562F Q33964312-33A95275-56F5-4A59-95B5-53C2E9D09FC2 Q34556546-87FB7948-1B81-43F8-B2CE-794FB7481CBB Q34731320-E25C2FFB-C9C8-4414-AD49-6BE89318F821 Q34770968-30770DEB-6266-495C-A091-E3391E9D98D5 Q35012740-7C5BDC3F-DE04-4B56-A2C6-61E9F7D2E5F5 Q35112382-F87F5FDD-7773-400E-9C9F-7F1729137D10 Q35126323-7AB20277-2144-4F32-B70D-0411E1FA872F Q36533705-BAD64336-C18C-4588-B4FE-4E33A68063C2 Q36726371-812F9916-6108-488B-9095-13D22BD43C22 Q36727156-A38B3FB7-08C0-4E60-8B63-2B2ACCE891B3 Q36734525-9C9A6FCF-C7A4-49E2-84D2-B1640A1E79B8 Q36802395-E0E181CD-A762-42DA-94B9-2591EDFA5CB2 Q36824906-A2588BA0-5FDF-4619-BBA5-49F6C1C781FC Q36824934-F92370C1-B3BB-4463-90CA-135974B7DF2F Q37211022-17877F00-E541-454D-982C-EE1C7FDDF2BE Q37261287-9031971D-F2B4-41BF-8BCE-5D5E954669CA Q37288821-297D56E6-ADBE-41BE-BA33-27B72D46AED5 Q37450161-B0C5C723-5313-47CB-95D7-C44AB16422C6 Q37951842-7A7646ED-F43B-4B62-AF73-C80101083D99 Q38117075-EB6A9DA5-3D0C-4402-9B6B-822EC5BE78C4 Q38685945-326C4043-E368-4868-847A-5B12A33CD746 Q40456279-69FCEB96-A3A6-45C8-8FAC-057527024ECF Q41657762-8E7ABCE2-1204-4BB8-861D-91704E50FABE Q42614828-65B1294C-D5DF-4A01-86C4-F47523FC65AD Q43466820-37765086-5159-478E-8FE5-0E1171DA33DC Q45400270-A95DC6EC-C6D1-4501-B87C-698D67435FD7 Q58882215-A20C8DA5-E0B1-4A61-8929-CE54FBDC54B3

P2860

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35126277

description

2005 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2005 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2005 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2005年の論文

@ja

2005年論文

@yue

2005年論文

@zh-hant

2005年論文

@zh-hk

2005年論文

@zh-mo

2005年論文

@zh-tw

2005年论文

@wuu

name

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@ast

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@en

type

label

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@ast

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@en

prefLabel

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@ast

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@en

P1433

Q35126277-A23EACF0-23C1-4DA9-BFB5-6E59ECA0129A

P1476

Q35126277-BBE69895-908C-41FA-BA6F-50B0B3B6360C

P2093

Q35126277-0E096703-A9D8-49E2-9387-29FA58D03F87

Q35126277-27BED1CA-2789-4F89-81DA-B5C84D77D89A

Q35126277-5E5420E4-47C6-4D2F-88CE-444037A12E57

Q35126277-6F41813C-9ADB-4B37-9CB2-F8486E5C44ED

Q35126277-765A2CAE-1EBF-4258-B6C9-54E8BA8C0E07

Q35126277-8784DA66-F016-4643-81CD-24C5E2139A1B

Q35126277-AD9FB1B9-8C0B-4209-BA56-5347A57B03DC

Q35126277-C868C5BB-34B2-418C-BD14-B848B8032FFC

Q35126277-F504DCEF-B750-4DD2-9680-27D9195A8801

P2860

Q35126277-0353B7C9-3E5D-4A8E-A8A5-6DB4CEA34DEF

Q35126277-03C28B0C-D3A2-463A-BD2D-D8B461611444

Q35126277-04A7B8BE-988D-4956-907B-0EDE43AD13E8

Q35126277-0548DE5C-8DCA-4881-8B8C-541F65915F49

Q35126277-230DD5BD-B56C-466E-9897-8467CD5A0A41

Q35126277-2686AB19-EC2C-4C25-913F-B7934C149AF1

Q35126277-3173F8BF-2A1D-4747-A696-D273C40DCE24

Q35126277-3D2F3198-D814-4122-A840-EB0EAF7BFEE5

Q35126277-40448C08-B563-430A-B5C0-1F3312F809AE

Q35126277-4496E109-C9C4-48C8-8C6B-2B7D40046B02

P304

Q35126277-BDD0A760-8E85-4274-8B07-2CE9A1B5631D

P31

Q35126277-AF4EC3C4-9E86-45AF-9BC2-DF38A90F9482

P356

Q35126277-8DC48456-604A-4FCD-9018-5B4E77A20A27

P407

Q35126277-95428761-F5EF-4FA6-AD5C-5473206B6734

P433

Q35126277-46D54829-F7DC-493E-87EC-25A607415ECE

P478

Q35126277-36DB6931-4AB8-482A-80EB-2B311338F660

P577

Q35126277-6D80D6E1-170D-4970-97D5-1DE652314614

P5875

Q35126277-1AFE834A-BBDD-43C4-8917-52EFACBD10B3

P698

Q35126277-1C7E6DF5-1F7A-4370-8BF3-FF6AB2A7A110

P932

Q35126277-5A6A586B-F038-4C73-BDF6-3B8AF4B4085E

P356

RADIOL.2361040512

P1433

P1476

Does litigation influence medi ...... ience on screening mammography

@en

P2093

Carl J D'Orsi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gary R Cutter

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jessica S Fosse

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Joann G Elmore

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Linn A Abraham

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patricia A Carney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

R Edward Hendrick

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Stephen H Taplin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

William E Barlow

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

Physicians' personal malpractice experiences are not related to defensive clinical practices.

How physicians can improve patients' participation and maintenance in self-care.

No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice

International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials.

Cancer: improving early detection and prevention. A community practice randomised trial.

The determinants of physician attitudes and subjective norms toward drug information sources: modification and test of the theory of reasoned action.

A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients.

Defensive medicine and obstetrics.

P304

37-46

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1148/RADIOL.2361040512

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

236

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

7755978

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

15987961

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3143020

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string