Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
about
A comparison of two strategies for building an exposure prediction model10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workersPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and wheeze in a cohort of children with asthma in Fresno, CAAdvances in Understanding Air Pollution and CVD.Measurement error in time-series analysis: a simulation study comparing modelled and monitored dataConsequences of kriging and land use regression for PM2.5 predictions in epidemiologic analyses: insights into spatial variability using high-resolution satellite data.Combining PM2.5 Component Data from Multiple Sources: Data Consistency and Characteristics Relevant to Epidemiological Analyses of Predicted Long-Term ExposuresCalibrating MODIS aerosol optical depth for predicting daily PM2.5 concentrations via statistical downscaling.Refined ambient PM2.5 exposure surrogates and the risk of myocardial infarctionExposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies: key findings and future recommendations.Bayesian importance parameter modeling of misaligned predictors: soil metal measures related to residential history and intellectual disability in children.A Flexible Spatio-Temporal Model for Air Pollution with Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Covariates.Estimation methods with ordered exposure subject to measurement error and missingness in semi-ecological design.Modeling spatial and temporal variability of residential air exchange rates for the Near-Road Exposures and Effects of Urban Air Pollutants Study (NEXUS).Crizotinib exhibits antitumor activity by targeting ALK signaling not c-MET in pancreatic cancerThe association of long-term exposure to PM2.5 on all-cause mortality in the Nurses' Health Study and the impact of measurement-error correction.Modeling the residential infiltration of outdoor PM(2.5) in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air).Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: an extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study from 1974 to 2009.Current Methods and Challenges for Epidemiological Studies of the Associations Between Chemical Constituents of Particulate Matter and HealthAn assessment of air pollutant exposure methods in Mexico City, Mexico.A regionalized national universal kriging model using Partial Least Squares regression for estimating annual PM2.5 concentrations in epidemiology.A national prediction model for PM2.5 component exposures and measurement error-corrected health effect inference.Short-term exposure to particulate matter constituents and mortality in a national study of U.S. urban communities.Satellite-Based NO2 and Model Validation in a National Prediction Model Based on Universal Kriging and Land-Use Regression.A New Technique for Evaluating Land-use Regression Models and Their Impact on Health Effect Estimates.Historical Prediction Modeling Approach for Estimating Long-Term Concentrations of PM2.5 in Cohort Studies before the 1999 Implementation of Widespread Monitoring.Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: a pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies.Measurement Error in Spatial Exposure Models: Study Design Implications.Measurement error in two-stage analyses, with application to air pollution epidemiology.Long-term particulate matter exposure: Attributing health effects to individual PM components.Air Pollution Monitoring Design for Epidemiological Application in a Densely Populated City.Confounding adjustment and exposure prediction in environmental epidemiology: additional insights.Does exposure prediction bias health-effect estimation?: The relationship between confounding adjustment and exposure prediction.Design of an Air Pollution Monitoring Campaign in Beijing for Application to Cohort Health Studies.Incorporating Measurement Error from Modeled Air Pollution Exposures into Epidemiological Analyses.Accommodating the ecological fallacy in disease mapping in the absence of individual exposures.Modeling individual exposures to ambient PM2.5 in the diabetes and the environment panel study (DEPS).The contributions of risk factor trends to cardiometabolic mortality decline in 26 industrialized countries.Air pollution exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies.Impact of preferential sampling on exposure prediction and health effect inference in the context of air pollution epidemiology.
P2860
Q23917667-85FE621B-47B5-4C23-999C-FA1ABAD497BAQ23918937-4F60472C-C725-49D8-B2D9-D0714EE20297Q28652729-EAC96715-101D-490E-9767-7B0A4E887D61Q30244571-93979778-43EA-46F9-AAC1-BD153D4AC286Q30692935-E772BC4A-22FF-45A4-8AE8-7BDE9E63878FQ30828961-E4C9726F-9359-4579-A3C6-3D74C41B3A17Q30903632-47932832-4959-4AB4-8EA6-86248E432B37Q33784737-D98E025F-5D93-4538-A6A5-E37AEE9FDC2CQ33855175-16CF0A29-1A58-4128-89EE-F33164605E4FQ33869932-99AA4723-4016-4B62-955D-61051C4F6926Q34175326-DF10D942-C727-4710-AE69-FFFA0787E1FDQ34241308-AB35CEBA-29AB-48D9-8603-5B27ADA10CA1Q34402846-D8918D0E-27DF-4CD4-97D7-7B67BB09CBFEQ34578343-4889868A-BA4E-46B3-A930-00FD8270314EQ34619273-3A54ADB0-3A97-4465-A484-6C85DBBAF465Q35595199-207226E2-BAD1-492C-AA30-5D896937A6F6Q36064752-4E84246B-100B-48EA-99E4-00BCAAB1F98CQ36115420-0873FC31-075D-449B-A1A1-7FBB7D5FDC57Q36225221-44D533A3-BD87-4839-B2CE-25582B0ADF98Q36349504-1A33CD1B-9C90-4AD3-987E-8CE5DDE4CF10Q37149554-CB0B2E9E-731B-40DB-BEC6-00AA6023FBF7Q37149744-4CD851EA-B66E-4CBA-B943-D845876605FEQ37241104-389DD306-2305-42D8-BEC1-2BC4B7C64AF5Q37407781-ADE80568-6152-48D9-8080-A30975AB3E4FQ37573334-14DA59C8-3327-4462-A656-8FBBD05D637EQ37580528-74B6CCEA-D6FE-477E-89CC-C5B15F256DC9Q37581000-F766127B-C391-48C5-95FF-DC7DCCA363E5Q37692099-A6ADADF2-3611-470C-8B8E-B94463A0A4ADQ37714463-C191B451-2A57-4F87-B6DC-40CE04FC5A5DQ38462744-4A7580A3-6E8B-4BD1-8602-1025EF8D4017Q38663403-6B4E1CA2-66F2-415F-BCC3-9ADF6CCCE2F0Q42333645-7D000E74-EF43-4F1A-A25F-C08BAAA0E713Q42957226-81FE3884-367E-49B3-9BF8-1BA58EB4B117Q47303697-6893B56C-AC7E-46E5-AD15-73572B93855CQ47852899-95D6B996-2042-4471-9EFB-F1C972C1B8F9Q47956156-6E311DA1-4081-48F2-AD04-912BBC0D226CQ49359211-EB786E60-5E6D-4C30-8A37-CCA53EFCE6D6Q51216662-19F3738F-BC4C-48E6-9007-F983F778E5A5Q53111239-2EE5F65D-A38E-44D9-84CF-769F403845D0Q55001480-2108031E-72D3-4DE2-ABC3-EC21A18F599B
P2860
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@ast
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@en
type
label
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@ast
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@en
prefLabel
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@ast
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates?
@en
P2093
Adam A Szpiro
Lianne Sheppard
P2860
P2880
P304
P356
10.1097/EDE.0B013E3182254CC6
P577
2011-09-01T00:00:00Z