How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35429513

about

Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests Common methods of measuring 'informed choice' in screening participation: Challenges and future directions Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group.Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.Overdetection in breast cancer screening: development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid.Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation.Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.Financial incentives for increasing uptake of HPV vaccinations: a randomized controlled trial The role of communication in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts.Eliciting women's cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol Ethnic minority women prefer strong recommendations to be screened for cancer Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.An Individualized Approach to Cancer Screening Decisions in Older Adults: A Multilevel Framework.Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening.Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.Health literacy and informed decision making regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.Informed choice about Down syndrome screening - effect of an eHealth tool: a randomized controlled trial.Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening.Social representations of human papillomavirus in Bogotá, Colombia.'A low risk is still a risk': exploring women's attitudes towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in order to target disease prevention.A comparison of face to face and group education on informed choice and decisional conflict of pregnant women about screening tests of fetal abnormalities.Informing Women and Their Physicians about Recommendations for Adjunct Breast MRI Screening: A Cohort Study.It's hard to reach the "hard-to-reach": the challenges of recruiting people who do not access preventative healthcare services into interview studies A qualitative study exploring why people do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation and coronary heart disease self-help groups, and their rehabilitation experience without these resources

P2860

Q24200761-23E8CBD8-8FB9-4229-9234-65C57A2F36BE Q24244218-30A407CE-3A60-4662-AB16-5BB0751AA162 Q28069573-47C685B5-0183-4BD8-84D2-35839264268D Q30540772-872ED1E6-6393-42F9-A835-49426190A787 Q30578410-CE0E175A-2A0A-4C6F-AF4F-ACDB571B2FE8 Q33605457-CA2339EF-9D9A-4F24-BB65-D8F6E4D6FD97 Q33834179-B8EBD817-84A2-46E3-BF41-668B697CBBDC Q34264806-92E50591-614F-45E9-9D91-50F23E1BED9D Q34601338-B53207F5-51AA-41C3-BADD-5CEA30B25EAD Q34705206-EC8D2A6A-1321-4D19-BD89-248CBCF95A47 Q35032369-FBE86F78-CA50-4ADB-8B2B-09C3D25CE2B2 Q35813074-3C9CE898-4191-4DDF-A805-72249326B8BA Q36102272-116C6395-5AA1-41B3-9141-DF609D318F69 Q36270318-405F5BDF-4B58-49EC-8D49-E1F9A2A0F291 Q36304311-CEE2E336-742F-4297-A96B-39AB5C53F196 Q36451775-577F3FE2-E48E-4680-B0BD-90CF8BDEC4AC Q36809001-84F029C9-3E2A-4B87-A9B5-46543A05C42A Q37332172-E90888F2-9D65-4E19-8B8E-10B2DA0575E7 Q37333195-438E866A-B64F-4EFD-9023-282FE8325FCF Q37466638-8C436D40-01D5-478D-BC0E-56B1291EB26F Q38367087-2ACC3156-2707-4FDD-9B06-E8F2AD86AF75 Q40581842-AA27B76B-8573-4C61-B567-CDBDAB853840 Q45136794-117B5636-1A7A-4837-8B06-3E51CCC13066 Q47230014-527956F4-AE81-43C8-9414-B360F35FB251 Q48233913-09C5EFB9-141A-4E36-B41C-CF569AE159E7 Q49606166-0C60297A-F9E3-47C3-82DE-FC158F9BA63B Q50914124-4EEF6B3D-9B2F-47CB-B757-9919EAFC3ED5 Q57126514-57A5B679-CE02-45A6-AC5B-A23250CD8366 Q57851189-CB751240-D3FB-4CD7-9194-D148ECB0B5CA

P2860

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35429513

description

2005 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2005 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2005 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2005年の論文

@ja

2005年論文

@yue

2005年論文

@zh-hant

2005年論文

@zh-hk

2005年論文

@zh-mo

2005年論文

@zh-tw

2005年论文

@wuu

name

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@ast

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@en

type

label

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@ast

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@en

prefLabel

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@ast

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@en

P1433

Q35429513-5CE0EF63-EC97-4726-89DE-64B6B58376C8

P1476

Q35429513-D412DDBC-51B7-4F65-A2E6-9E9BDC6DC13E

P2093

Q35429513-1139A06E-7A39-415C-B0D3-5213B01A86EB

Q35429513-16989BE0-D25D-40E5-B012-ED91870E7738

Q35429513-7CDBA8DD-A324-4CD4-9986-50BDEC8F935B

Q35429513-D45FF8D3-7796-431F-99FE-EC553C0EC9A4

P2860

Q35429513-223061A5-93FA-4089-B813-B0519BB838EB

Q35429513-2620C1DC-A027-478B-9710-2D8529051609

Q35429513-4479E42E-B4FE-4F08-A8EF-CE44F9909754

Q35429513-51A99014-60A8-4A09-AC90-3A8BDF9E5295

Q35429513-67D9AD9F-FD09-45F1-8204-FCDDE23FD6EF

Q35429513-6A221630-5890-46DC-930B-5AFEE24C17A3

Q35429513-7A0450A9-AF06-4407-A082-5A3B6207303D

Q35429513-8EB4D112-CC5D-4031-A66F-591905850DF8

Q35429513-916ADCDD-5512-479D-BFD0-2816AE75755B

Q35429513-9A09EE40-7C04-4522-95A8-B7DC9F031FEE

P304

Q35429513-F6017B59-477B-4C36-B329-B1D5B9B6AFFC

P31

Q35429513-DAD1CC69-F4D1-4B19-A0F9-7EF7C8F8F4A0

P356

Q35429513-0C0A1033-691F-4C19-B3A2-DD48837D8333

P433

Q35429513-066F0A10-756C-4D41-86B0-920E09D586CD

P478

Q35429513-9351A58C-0FCA-4826-80A5-7DB8C5771941

P577

Q35429513-ACE437AC-40E9-490B-A6CF-330F5A16F3B8

P5875

Q35429513-B81EC49D-04B2-4364-95A9-D1F579346E81

P698

Q35429513-990E8924-01FC-46C3-B6E2-F64C2A78B8DA

P932

Q35429513-854BCD78-969B-45A5-B60F-C58F8525D703

P356

JME.2003.005793

P1433

Journal of Medical Ethics

P1476

How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

@en

P2093

Hewison J

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jepson RG

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thompson AG

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Weller D

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making

Ethical analysis in public health.

Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

Bridging the knowledge gap and communicating uncertainties for informed consent in cervical cytology screening; we need unbiased information and a culture change.

Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care

Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review

Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences

Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

Should public health respect autonomy?

The evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test.

P304

192-196

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/JME.2003.005793

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

31

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

7936404

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

15800356

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

1734132

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string