Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.
about
Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juriesMultilevel Modeling and Policy Development: Guidelines and Applications to Medical Travel.Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health CareA discrete choice experiment of preferences for genetic counselling among Jewish women seeking cancer genetics servicesFracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): study protocol for a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture [ISRCTN22464643].Acceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experimentFeatures of asthma management: quantifying the patient perspective.Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour: systematic review.IQuaD dental trial; improving the quality of dentistry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing oral hygiene advice and periodontal instrumentation for the prevention and management of periodontal disease in dentate adults attending dentA comprehensive representation of the birth-experience: identification and prioritization of birth-specific domains based on a mixed-method design.Parents' preferences for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.Are adult patients more tolerant of treatment risks than parents of juvenile patients?Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experimentUnderstanding clinicians' decisions to offer intravenous thrombolytic treatment to patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.TOWARDS PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DEPRESSION: CONJOINT METHODS TO TAILOR TREATMENT BASED ON PREFERENCES.Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment.Measuring consumer preference for models of diabetes care delivered by pharmacistsIdentifying and prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia.Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care modelsPreferences for participation in decision making among ethnically diverse patients with anxiety and depressionAn empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review.Patient and Provider Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: How Does CT Colonography Compare to Other Modalities?Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experimentIntegrating evidence into policy and sustainable disability services delivery in western New South Wales, Australia: the 'wobbly hub and double spokes' projectUnderstanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in AustraliaPreferences for health insurance in Germany and the Netherlands - a tale of two countries.Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance.The effect of perceived risks on the demand for vaccination: results from a discrete choice experiment.Patient preferences for adherence to treatment for osteoarthritis: the MEdication Decisions in Osteoarthritis Study (MEDOS).Study protocol: longitudinal study of the transition of young people with complex health needs from child to adult health services.Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis.Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-catheters.Clinical decision-making of cardiologists regarding admission and treatment of patients with suspected unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: protocol of a clinical vignette studyWhat determines adherence to treatment in cardiovascular disease prevention? Protocol for a mixed methods preference studyThe association between general practitioner participation in joint teleconsultations and rates of referral: a discrete choice experiment.Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening.Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experimentsCase vignettes based on EQ-5D to elicit stated preferences for health services utilization from the insurees' perspective.Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease.
P2860
Q26863705-CEBE805B-7D91-482A-BEBD-39D42A1D304AQ27304638-71F21C8B-5ED1-4AAA-8DE0-038E0C32B1E2Q28072872-975A6216-2CFA-4434-81AA-3730A6EB9EA0Q28384136-CF44A1A3-FC22-4D59-9D0C-0F9808AFFF67Q28587637-24543DFA-B8DD-4C59-84C9-B09D8F294774Q30365074-FE59A443-84DA-4578-A8A7-AE43BCD17F02Q33308919-425CC25B-8F6F-4736-84E0-84BC1CFE5AFBQ33355873-8C56C4B8-CFB8-4663-8A36-6097E1F57FE5Q33590232-27FD8967-4EA9-41F6-9A2B-D42530DDFE16Q33613047-35FFBA48-CA0A-4B52-92DB-7D40057FE1DFQ33719736-110F7708-ACD0-4166-9C91-10B268E5A941Q33761151-7D0AA3B1-7C6C-41D3-9E03-A99585FE7382Q33834025-144C5DE0-2650-46D7-9B42-0F39440538C4Q33879828-48E7FF06-B5F6-43E5-87F8-CF1F249D0DDEQ34023813-DFD19E15-A793-4E04-AF44-C2D0A709F93EQ34031503-87A4A425-0CE3-4DC0-AF0B-2471D6C742D9Q34053153-7353850C-740D-460B-9C72-E6CAEFA57C9EQ34065382-711B0F9E-5ADA-4756-BE19-5B15F3ADDD62Q34091305-0BA8D217-C9EB-47D7-9367-417E61817FFCQ34097159-027D9E42-BAA1-49D9-81F5-0F48B1411500Q34164094-8B654F0A-893E-499A-A490-4465491F413EQ34169202-A1CD64F1-BDF5-43FE-AD1B-88F929075926Q34193853-F2863AC2-031A-4E84-B096-317FC7BD5621Q34199406-3FBACFBE-531D-4EAB-8C76-E0A748FF7574Q34205199-75EBE2E8-562B-4A5D-95E0-CD4F8B8ECD76Q34310563-2D8F28D9-0916-4C4F-98ED-BD17F2F28DDFQ34404585-F2D55ACC-9F8C-4839-A048-27209117D29DQ34404594-418E61EC-888B-488E-8BD9-F88D48C39399Q34585849-BC6306B3-5AD6-41B5-ADDE-479B6B72462DQ34707575-00112A02-2104-49AC-9C89-47DDEE911E77Q34856124-673BC763-D6AE-4261-9A9B-3942857612ACQ35017485-E2C47347-53A6-4FF0-BB88-D220E4F22E29Q35173324-2730C2A1-2A2C-48D5-B64E-71435C011A4FQ35331929-AA63AB61-2EA1-4BBB-AF77-06DCC75EC0BEQ35536172-CBCC763F-61E1-4B2C-A318-FED91C8E2465Q35610431-AFA53B18-FAEF-490C-A70D-B27868FC5C35Q35649039-5C951C80-F0E1-4BEF-B0FE-DA70E640F917Q35678123-2F4F9112-620C-463B-A48E-70C18BA0B161Q35820830-0E3A86A2-06E2-4FD8-8199-F0BF2B1EE943Q35839493-5F344700-F628-4943-BEC1-176018DD1982
P2860
Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@ast
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@en
type
label
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@ast
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@en
prefLabel
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@ast
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@en
P1476
Using discrete choice experime ...... d future research reflections.
@en
P2093
Karen Gerard
Mandy Ryan
P577
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z