Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?
about
Evidence and practice in spine registriesShort-term hypertension management in community is associated with long-term risk of stroke and total death in China: A community controlled trialSpine Tango registry data collection in a conservative spinal service: a feasibility study.An observational study on surgically treated adult idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-ups and comparison to controlsEmpty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) show slow radiographic fusion that reduces clinical improvement: results from the prospective multicenter "PIERCE-PEEK" study.Evaluating non-responders of a survey in the Swedish fracture register: no indication of different functional result.Differences in response rates between mail, e-mail, and telephone follow-up in hand surgery research.Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.Recurrent Versus Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: Patient-reported Outcomes in the Swedish Spine Register Swespine.Factors associated with non-response in routine use of patient reported outcome measures after elective surgery in England.Predictors of return after cast removal in patients with a nonoperatively treated distal radius fracture.Modic type I changes and recovery of back pain after lumbar microdiscectomy.Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.Reliability of patient-reported functional outcome in a joint replacement registry. A comparison of primary responders and non-responders in the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry.Instrumentation in lumbar fusion improves back pain but not quality of life 2 years after surgery. A study of 1,310 patients with degenerative disc disease from the Swedish Spine Register SWESPINE.Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery? : estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures.Factors associated with survey response in hand surgery research.Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter observational study.Open discectomy vs microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation - a protocol for a pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.Lumbar microdiscectomy for sciatica in adolescents: a multicentre observational registry-based studyComparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational studyDeterminants of outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.Loss to follow-up in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review.The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Individuals Aged 80 and Older: A Multicenter Observational Study.Reliability of the revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires in adult spinal deformity when administered by telephone.Similar result after non-elective and elective surgery for lumbar disc herniation: an observational study based on the SweSpine register.Risk factors for surgical site infections among 1,772 patients operated on for lumbar disc herniation: a multicentre observational registry-based study.Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry.Microsurgical decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-center observational study.Does daily tobacco smoking affect outcomes after microdecompression for degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis? - A multicenter observational registry-based study.Obesity has an impact on outcome in lumbar disc surgery.The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.Outcome of surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: an observational study using the Swedish Spine register.Evaluation of non-response in quality control of nasal septal surgery.Surgery for Herniated Lumbar Disk in Individuals 65 Years of Age or Older: A Multicenter Observational Study.Outcome of spine surgery: In a clinical field with few randomized controlled studies, a national spine surgery register creates evidence for practice guidelines
P2860
Q26865134-2289185F-3811-4F19-B6AC-08971F187A3DQ30830649-41FDA412-5569-4436-B559-9696E0A661C4Q31116158-5E06DD07-5CB8-4EA0-91A3-B02106380DF4Q33556624-0BCC0483-87BF-44C5-A0CB-B611AD1EDFD4Q33617799-C588DB8D-497D-4FBE-8BC0-B7C9E8066827Q33851075-1C04FA79-4F7B-4E66-B44E-1A9D92A1DE16Q34534505-E7DD1E05-55BF-4122-86DF-5ABDCB7B5D1BQ35238572-9031803D-AE7E-4458-AAD4-780A42380059Q35567429-D0755F3D-C533-43B9-8D34-C24885F34324Q35935093-9B04416C-D275-4CA6-8C36-B2FCAAE501D7Q36019796-5019F0AA-E56D-4C03-8AC7-7FF7EF2F2EA2Q36347090-6A685E3E-8310-4AC9-BA30-504ACFC9C212Q36405992-D9367D59-5B23-491E-885A-63B5713FF77BQ36645575-9F28A37A-8D67-46EC-96B7-5A2088DFDD0FQ36645616-D3EB4535-222A-4259-8FF0-8A021321A89EQ36803929-CCE586C3-D3AF-4D9E-967B-C4C1148509B1Q37170967-D56A2884-27D8-4EEC-85D9-C43FB7A2340CQ37296364-0E09719B-7031-4B47-B54B-ABD93E5EAE5FQ37384239-D2D0148C-562D-456A-A280-7CAD8525E77CQ37639387-0F790763-0215-4AC9-BFEE-B1A8D17C37D6Q37657370-32C6BF9B-92FD-4632-8C69-E371C5D33D03Q38285809-4262AC2A-0807-4AC7-8CB5-505C194E7937Q38824651-46C070CC-C57C-4004-A96B-0669B6968D16Q38841463-1869BD1C-0520-4805-A31E-DD6A09FA45C0Q39406643-A6EF4411-5821-4EB6-BA5A-19CBE0735102Q39903483-D7066C1A-AA94-4990-819C-FD6FF9FC3C0BQ40020359-DACAFE65-D083-4AC2-9CC7-1E15F690C98BQ40244596-D2EC55B8-616E-4C7C-B1BB-07C5AF65910BQ40698822-6825826B-A732-40DC-BA83-23888BE382B9Q40909397-D79F9ADF-79A9-4785-BF18-55B6536C661EQ40973575-19714714-438F-426E-89D9-061345971E9EQ47927024-F9EC51F0-5C54-4A23-8FD7-7BB677577150Q48148122-51D27A36-5DD6-4586-A3A3-F78EA66CA6E1Q48286019-C768CDFC-2077-4DA8-95D5-E6F0DDC0E4BAQ53222796-91748125-17E3-4C6A-955A-7B02AE859835Q55259832-FA71EF33-EB30-479A-B362-9C714DD0A275Q57877631-48521718-7CB7-4C42-BD47-C1045C9C49D4
P2860
Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@ast
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@en
type
label
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@ast
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@en
prefLabel
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@ast
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Would loss to follow-up bias t ...... disorders of the lumbar spine?
@en
P2093
Andreas Sørlie
Kristin Sjaavik
Tore K Solberg
Øystein P Nygaard
P2860
P356
10.3109/17453674.2010.548024
P577
2010-12-29T00:00:00Z