Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the number-needed-to-treat: common sense or non-sense?
about
Use of number needed to treat in cost-effectiveness analyses.Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori test for management of dyspepsia: a randomized trial in primary care.On the clinical meaningfulness of a treatment's effect on a time-to-event variable.Preoperative staging of lung cancer with PET/CT: cost-effectiveness evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.Cost-effectiveness analysis of two management strategies for dyspepsia
P2860
Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the number-needed-to-treat: common sense or non-sense?
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@ast
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@en
type
label
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@ast
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@en
prefLabel
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@ast
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@en
P356
P1433
P1476
Cost-effectiveness analysis ba ...... at: common sense or non-sense?
@en
P2093
Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
P356
10.1002/HEC.797
P407
P577
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z