The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?
about
Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in hemiplegic patientsRisk of dislocation using large- vs. small-diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplastyModular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.Head-neck taper corrosion in hip arthroplastyPrimary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeveRemoval of restrictions following primary THA with posterolateral approach does not increase the risk of early dislocation.Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.Acetabular liner with focal constraint to prevent dislocation after THALow rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplastyHigh complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?The value of computed tomography based navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty.Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options.Hip fusion takedown to a total hip arthroplasty-is it worth it? A systematic review.Isolated revision of the acetabular component using alumina-on-alumina bearings without a metal sleeve: A preliminary study.Benefit and risk in short term after total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach combined with dual mobility cup.Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty.The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.Large (36 or 40-mm) femoral heads decreased the rate of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Comparison of metal ion levels in patients with hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty.Double mobility cup total hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk for dislocation: a single-center analysis.A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.Is the use of thin, highly cross-linked polyethylene liners safe in total hip arthroplasty?Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.How to prevent dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the risk factors and a focus on treatment optionsThe impact of capsular repair on the risk for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort-study of 259 cases
P2860
Q33754671-27BD2358-1C39-4222-958E-9A2BA464A43CQ34434988-90F8BA53-1688-4E0E-BB37-EE3701651B66Q34962971-1EE1849A-035C-4731-8A4D-1A5FC1356618Q35425817-CA8F2844-F505-4FAC-A825-B9BC29507610Q35543701-BD7BB303-F569-45FD-B39E-D0738CFCDC98Q35646426-87E0F71E-5451-415F-AA86-4818D53D908DQ35885271-C3909384-80B3-4A2B-B673-07567FD41367Q36452541-18C862EE-190F-4D18-8CF3-08CF9B40C550Q36545831-5780EA6D-4297-4CFD-96B9-23E85F920FC1Q36740748-BDF62073-D743-4792-A241-09D332F3C464Q37189008-BA1495F8-E47E-42B2-962C-250EFFB61A5EQ37303257-E0C924AC-3867-4356-B3A8-8B10982966D1Q37303279-B1E45D02-EF78-48EE-B763-4A944CAEB63EQ37472357-C22207A9-3660-400D-B151-9544ABC3F5CEQ37676532-D5E4035F-00DD-433A-A4F4-B2A20DC8E839Q37676653-3D1BD4EE-3F5A-4B5A-92C1-41E2B8E00C9FQ38778709-F4606A4F-ECAD-42AB-8BD3-159BF47D2179Q39045078-8217D1A8-014B-418D-BBA3-7063010C81B2Q39090244-49AB2F0D-2EAE-4F2D-BB2C-DBF71CD30FD8Q39204074-95DF7096-CA1F-443E-910F-38A2AF79A41FQ39452666-9DB4375E-3C62-495C-8854-E56554AF6DB2Q39677950-D276E1B0-37F1-4BD1-BEC9-642C55BF07C4Q40417020-D5A7E0AF-D872-4CE6-84C1-90A1BDD3ADEBQ40679900-AAEB534C-F2EA-4C75-BA71-781393EF1863Q41159335-0D2068FE-25F3-4B58-AB78-5462BA4C3569Q48361173-8160AFBE-99CE-4A8C-BDC1-EEEA3E38B66DQ50211965-CC941FF7-26EB-4A68-965D-D2DC6F6C74CCQ51702553-B969B58B-24E1-4346-9D47-40B01DF0E3D6Q52985610-786468FC-DEA0-41F1-9A02-A514EE48C963Q53194149-01F5F8A5-6A63-4B6C-8AC2-DDCBE859C2D0Q53482856-B8C68CE6-44AF-466D-AF3D-E50C9A690AD2Q58756446-D77E57B5-7262-469E-87A2-D5D46491952AQ58782090-83BAC092-9535-45B7-8AC6-518C4A6212A9
P2860
The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@ast
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@en
type
label
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@ast
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@en
prefLabel
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@ast
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
The Frank Stinchfield Award: D ...... n a randomized clinical trial?
@en
P2093
Allan E Gross
Clive P Duncan
Craig J Della Valle
Donald S Garbuz
Eric R Bohm
Martin J Petrak
Nelson V Greidanus
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11999-011-2146-X
P407
P50
P577
2012-02-01T00:00:00Z