NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
about
Anesthesiology physician scientists in academic medicine: a wake-up callThe not-for-profit form and translational research: Kerr revisited?Demystifying the NIH grant application processProcedural challenges in international collaborative researchAn analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIHCommercialization of basic research from within the university and return of value to the publicSurgery investigators funded through the National Institutes of Health: A rebirth.Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding for surgery: 2003 to 2013.Clinician-scientists in Canada: barriers to career entry and progress.Challenges and opportunities for reinvigorating the physician-scientist pipeline.A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institutionNIH grant awards as a metric of clinical and translational research training effectiveness.How Criterion Scores Predict the Overall Impact Score and Funding Outcomes for National Institutes of Health Peer-Reviewed ApplicationsOutcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications.Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications?Publication track records as a metric of clinical research training effectiveness.Barriers to investigator-initiated deep brain stimulation and device research.Scholarly investigation into otitis media: who is receiving funding support from the National Institutes of Health?Recent Trends in Oral Cavity Cancer Research Support in the United States.Academic and career development of pulmonary and critical care physician-scientists.Recent trends in oropharyngeal cancer funding and public interest.National Institutes of Health Funding for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Opportunity for Otolaryngologists.The role of chairman and research director in influencing scholarly productivity and research funding in academic orthopaedic surgery.AAO-HNSF CORE grant acquisition is associated with greater scholarly impact.Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology.Report of the AACP Educating Clinical Scientists Task Force.Survey of the impact of National Institutes of Health clinical research curriculum awards (K30) between 1999 and 2004.NIH Funding within Otolaryngology: 2005-2014.Factors Associated With Success of Clinician-Researchers Receiving Career Development Awards From the National Institutes of Health: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.Contributions of international medical graduates to US biomedical research: The experience of US medical schools.The JIM interview.What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.
P2860
Q24645665-91CA8AF9-B8A4-49BF-B465-C1EE0D7500E5Q24800654-2DF1DCCE-AF6D-4E22-8BD4-22780FA75CB2Q28383287-35991869-985A-42CE-B150-43C537925357Q28390123-60743377-F7DF-427A-9EDF-D7C40C700BACQ28748308-78CA227D-69A8-40F2-BCC3-D67E66209E16Q28755240-7CE1B9F2-8022-421B-BDE0-C4821EF131FEQ30274844-555A3810-5748-4045-BB85-C02A8404E290Q30300015-919FBB80-EF2C-4F82-AA62-95CDAC089382Q33722025-01162FA7-612C-456C-ADA7-8BC8198128DBQ34463301-C8FCF31C-166F-415E-9032-3A823E3DDB5AQ34790956-48D7A536-62AB-4CDB-8638-BC7220BB44F2Q35085214-0A6C5561-1ABC-4726-AF39-E9DAADBFE6E8Q36036323-A49142DB-40C3-4630-8D06-D317EDD06E48Q36367108-9CE54070-B8D7-40E2-97FB-CA8BFA23532FQ36840504-89AF3919-707E-4D9C-AB33-3A92B2759B21Q37405746-1A457F5E-D720-4D3D-907B-9D32BC445E8DQ37725900-C951E5FD-3D76-46F0-8CDA-F711B8B910D0Q38356538-3F8A4694-22C6-4A11-8634-88C090E43A26Q39053560-2A064E14-3523-4ACC-9298-0276ADE4B1ADQ39361586-D1C3AC3A-309C-441F-A9EA-FFC28E0A2ACCQ40248790-669DB124-6356-4217-AC19-279F9036BEF1Q40826018-1F491336-D968-4EE1-A9CC-D2EEFA9078DCQ40976677-7DC9A6BF-978C-4E12-BCA7-8ECD3E4631E2Q44071386-681C78AD-DA29-4165-9538-28CE6B97EA70Q45791293-E7A67B4C-EF6C-4C99-8DFC-06E371BBF444Q45983266-6092C1EF-0FA5-4E4D-B4D4-F55B9D90F5C6Q46514299-21F79383-9E8D-4AC9-B9F0-5EE46241C543Q47325188-CBCE4F4F-423B-49C0-B809-D7B4A527E6F4Q47366052-84AA0092-FE22-4595-B6DE-852EE69CE4ABQ48591949-DA24AC5A-96C8-4FE5-B2D2-CA6FC8718F2CQ48605575-5EDF7204-8CDF-496C-AD21-0BFA6D5CE505Q53282277-4B492DA4-4F2C-47A4-B57D-B0189223EC23Q55526711-92B74032-4653-4E52-B277-D54024FDBBF4
P2860
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@ast
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@en
type
label
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@ast
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@en
prefLabel
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@ast
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
@en
P2093
Ellie Ehrenfeld
Karl Malik
Teresa Lindquist
Theodore A Kotchen
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.291.7.836
P407
P577
2004-02-01T00:00:00Z