Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
about
Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackersDevices for Self-Monitoring Sedentary Time or Physical Activity: A Scoping ReviewClinical Evaluation of the Measurement Performance of the Philips Health Watch: A Within-Person Comparative StudyAn Activity Index for Raw Accelerometry Data and Its Comparison with Other Activity Metrics.Wearable Devices and Smartphones for Activity Tracking Among People with Serious Mental IllnessHow consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research.Validity of Research-Grade Actigraphy Unit for Measuring Exercise Intensity.Unravelling the potential mechanisms behind hospitalization-associated disability in older patients; the Hospital-Associated Disability and impact on daily Life (Hospital-ADL) cohort study protocol.Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors.Validation study of Polar V800 accelerometer.Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph AccelerometryPhysical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living ConditionsEvaluating the Consistency of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Health Monitoring: A Comparison Under Free-Living Conditions.The Wild Wild West: A Framework to Integrate mHealth Software Applications and Wearables to Support Physical Activity Assessment, Counseling and Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction.Validation of a Self-Monitoring Tool for Use in Exercise Therapy.Comparative accuracy of fitness tracking modalities in quantifying energy expenditure.Physical activity levels and perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity in HIV-infected women living in the deep south of the United States.Feasibility of a telephone and web-based physical activity intervention for women shift workers.Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation.Criterion-Validity of Commercially Available Physical Activity Tracker to Estimate Step Count, Covered Distance and Energy Expenditure during Sports Conditions.Monitoring Energy Expenditure Using a Multi-Sensor Device-Applications and Limitations of the SenseWear Armband in Athletic Populations.Comparison of In-Person and Online Motivational Interviewing-Based Health Coaching.A two-stage model for wearable device data.Validation of a method for estimating energy expenditure during walking in middle-aged adults.Wearable biosensors to monitor disability in multiple sclerosis.Evaluating Machine Learning-Based Automated Personalized Daily Step Goals Delivered Through a Mobile Phone App: Randomized Controlled Trial.A Primer on the Use of Equivalence Testing for Evaluating Measurement Agreement.Applicability of consumer activity monitor data in marathon events: an exploratory study.Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge HR.Validity of heart rate measurements by the Garmin Forerunner 225 at different walking intensities.How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables.Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study.VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE FITBIT FLEX™ AND ACTIGRAPH GT3X+ AT JOGGING AND RUNNING SPEEDSComparison of Polar Active Watch and Waist- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers for Measuring Children's Physical Activity Levels during Unstructured Afterschool ProgramsAccuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data
P2860
Q26774705-5EF43B19-D148-49D8-8899-A3A1A0CD5BF8Q28079994-189D6416-C65A-4647-BC78-26BC353900DCQ29248007-BD9E3F41-3526-4AB0-9F7F-9E9780845903Q31121057-EB386E4A-74F5-4C50-8DD9-800D2321E79BQ33448506-BCD01403-E61C-4B6C-AD71-409258DC059CQ33452118-CE32E721-C1DF-49EA-956D-B088EB2F7F19Q33748742-0609307A-F1FF-44E8-AE28-E4AC7E27A47AQ35946543-7F9FA27B-E1F6-4352-9E29-86639054B445Q36289834-44C41E4E-336B-49D1-952B-56A4496E3233Q37165987-A630BFFC-4D7F-4CD6-9BA8-F5CAAAB67286Q37273915-D37C80B2-D2A8-4D8E-B2C7-33CC14A2C72AQ37306811-5D75A440-410C-400E-9A9A-D37DE484BCC2Q37714648-8A92F801-B3C3-4356-BE98-A44AE8CCCBBFQ37716110-152140A6-8908-4900-8DDB-E129B335CB7BQ38841673-C4814B1A-60FE-493D-8876-CEA7F5D58264Q39697108-68D54A17-5FAB-4F97-8A94-277B1308FD40Q39882217-8FA7EB98-6185-4B12-8DFC-661028611E03Q41122906-08B2CE95-D747-4394-A237-6D08219829E1Q41224395-B930E617-286A-45AE-8635-713526C862C8Q41984939-B4D25D12-EE0A-410C-8525-2D0F62359972Q47094062-717F6EFC-C057-4981-9F0E-7BAA51E92B8DQ47276258-5836EA28-C624-4928-8167-38008B30F10AQ47314848-9953E12F-5744-415A-A69D-520D3A681782Q47336492-09A089CC-4DB1-4EC8-93A4-733FE9014F15Q47398671-CB03EFD0-D650-4A2E-AA4D-E10BF5223934Q47548998-334E1A53-B9CA-4FFB-8BDE-94D75D801B65Q47600448-449B909C-8ED1-449E-8076-11F82D9AECFBQ47625300-9C3DA215-5F70-40B0-B920-923F9B832654Q48047161-AC243367-1921-4350-9917-3B22587AB0A2Q48181937-5016723B-551F-4606-81FD-55975AF6A10EQ48585871-0984967B-DFC3-49C2-A1D0-24D06104E6F4Q52641944-9267FA9C-ACDD-4DF8-95FF-79D27E10B81AQ54998471-EB7A752F-E7C5-4B05-90AD-4FA7A508F270Q57136919-0348DC65-7873-4C9C-90B1-AD804BE5FEF3Q58555511-223BCC7E-B107-4787-8441-6D174211345FQ58792839-542DABF0-86D9-4525-9737-F11B36E5FD7E
P2860
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@ast
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@en
type
label
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@ast
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@ast
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@en
P2093
P1476
Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
@en
P2093
Gregory J Welk
Joey A Lee
Jung-Min Lee
Philip M Dixon
Yoon Ho Nam
Youngwon Kim
P304
P356
10.1249/MSS.0000000000000727
P577
2015-07-06T00:00:00Z