Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
about
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic paintDCS of the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand in 2016? Technical Issues and Critical Review of the LiteratureTaking Sides: An Integrative Review of the Impact of Laterality and Polarity on Efficacy of Therapeutic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Anomia in Chronic Poststroke AphasiaSafety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescentsThe Effects of tDCS Across the Spatial Frequencies and Orientations that Comprise the Contrast Sensitivity FunctionNeuroelectronics and Biooptics: Closed-Loop Technologies in Neurological DisordersCan transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alleviate symptoms and improve cognition in psychiatric disorders?Spreading Effect of tDCS in Individuals with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder as Shown by Functional Cortical Networks: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Anodal tDCS to Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Facilitates Performance for Novice Jazz Improvisers but Hinders Experts.Modulation of Brain Activity with Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Clinical Applications and Safety ConcernsDelayed plastic responses to anodal tDCS in older adults.Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: The Impact of Baseline Severity and Task Specificity in a Pilot Sample.Can we improve pain and sleep in elderly individuals with transcranial direct current stimulation? - Results from a randomized controlled pilot studyEnhanced long-term memory encoding after parietal neurostimulationResults availability for analgesic device, complex regional pain syndrome, and post-stroke pain trials: comparing the RReADS, RReACT, and RReMiT databases.Dosage considerations for transcranial direct current stimulation in children: a computational modeling study.Analgesic efficacy of cerebral and peripheral electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, factorial clinical trial.Does transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal cortex affect mood and emotional memory retrieval in healthy individuals?Longitudinal neurostimulation in older adults improves working memory.Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): review and recommendations from an expert panel.Task-concurrent anodal tDCS modulates bilateral plasticity in the human suprahyoid motor cortex.Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.Are Participants Aware of the Type and Intensity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation?Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults.High-Definition and Non-invasive Brain Modulation of Pain and Motor Dysfunction in Chronic TMDTranscranial Direct Current Brain Stimulation Increases Ability to Resist SmokingTranscranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: a computational modeling study.Long-Term Effects of Serial Anodal tDCS on Motion Perception in Subjects with Occipital Stroke Measured in the Unaffected Visual Hemifield.Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation.Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances verbal working memory training performance over time and near transfer outcomes.Cerebellar tDCS Modulates Neural Circuits during Semantic Prediction: A Combined tDCS-fMRI StudyLow intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.Frontoparietal neurostimulation modulates working memory training benefits and oscillatory synchronization.Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.Electroencephalographic changes following direct current deep brain stimulation of auditory cortex: a new model for investigating neuromodulation.Working memory capacity differentially influences responses to tDCS and HD-tDCS in a retro-cue task.Individualized treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to strokeCognitive enhancement.Cooperation Not Competition: Bihemispheric tDCS and fMRI Show Role for Ipsilateral Hemisphere in Motor Learning.
P2860
Q24197454-27BC8F1B-FACA-46A0-9AFB-80F83D1140EAQ26744742-7E8576D1-ABDD-4E84-8028-F62167877DAEQ26773078-07C54E3D-A844-4C8E-B03B-BBAA6D47CE8DQ27004463-E09E2D28-84F8-47A7-BB60-17CB5B8C4836Q27305744-C00BA4C9-BD66-46CD-BED4-A1706FD63E12Q28087559-5BA51CA8-AF8E-448A-AD7D-A69F9BE6E852Q28306243-10CCADDC-95DD-48A6-B5E6-FBB92D00654AQ30659884-17397B3F-B2ED-43C9-A0F8-090B3C9BCE13Q30828783-559833FD-5A6E-4515-92C3-9746982C8A25Q33653841-4E774470-98F2-4A99-94E0-3FB53873417AQ33719031-520095CB-0302-4C1D-A784-DEDDD305159DQ33734732-327D85BC-E158-42B2-8625-ED9689599523Q33803661-BA3072A4-5E97-4E18-A1FD-55A495AED422Q34560065-F4F4E5D1-E217-4A84-9905-5E996328BF26Q34790930-671C7635-FD46-4A20-8839-A49EB40F666AQ35006209-F462360D-513E-4FE3-9BA4-27F8A7DDCC9EQ35068747-EB0A1CB4-2B41-4691-B875-4B4D5AD0216DQ35126273-49B7094B-E0D6-4DE3-B2F3-C276D65D3717Q35306645-9E9079F1-A2BF-42E8-B30B-6D747319EA64Q35606453-D6DCDD72-21FE-474E-AF4D-1AF104CE96FDQ35773372-D50F6E8E-3F32-4D22-AC31-F5877A8435D5Q35871327-3861397D-D619-435A-B969-5B5898D4D687Q35919754-6C05E310-22B7-4A7C-B3FC-E86E0011DA8CQ35930644-A6FC2387-BF3E-4675-81B7-F130A92043D0Q36307471-A3CDAC53-84AC-4FE6-BBAE-2D1D6C433287Q36680075-3223BAD1-FA97-434C-8419-170ABC6D170BQ36810560-FED920AF-FB6E-4881-A719-C89593515E03Q36949397-5594D35A-7AAB-4FF2-894C-6C20C588E07AQ37479411-649E45EC-EB52-4F1B-8454-7D2A843568BBQ38176607-BDC2F4C5-9910-44C1-99E1-FB432B6BF779Q38205265-1CF326B6-F066-4E3E-AD8B-7EE30FFDE21EQ38382598-C4680D87-7B5D-46FA-8D12-558642385E54Q38657380-6290FD9E-477D-4290-808E-A15602B157EBQ38787062-36E69356-2023-495D-993E-B6A45FE0A4B3Q38884450-F07EF86C-CD01-4459-AD5F-6E5829F68232Q39520475-6B929006-32AE-4049-AE07-6AB4E3E8618EQ39638196-3D84453B-9293-4FC5-9612-50834113F44DQ39833982-3D016843-10FE-4F20-A246-BE51F1CBCE25Q40610536-E1DAEB11-960D-4301-A74D-C88BBDC3DABFQ41275813-EB6A2E15-CB1D-4DFB-A821-1145C14F6807
P2860
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
2011年论文
@zh
2011年论文
@zh-cn
name
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
@ast
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
@en
type
label
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
@ast
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
@en
prefLabel
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
@ast
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation
@en
P2093
Jennifer G Benson
Roy H Hamilton
Sudha Kilaru Kessler
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.BRS.2011.02.007
P577
2011-03-27T00:00:00Z