Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
about
Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Predictors of length of stay after urogynecological surgery at a tertiary referral center.Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients treated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Is it a safe procedure for all patients?Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.
P2860
Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@ast
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
type
label
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@ast
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@ast
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Laparoscopic versus open sacro ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
Barry Whitlow
Leica Sarah Claydon
Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Maribel De Gouveia De Sa
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1007/S00192-015-2765-Y
P577
2015-08-07T00:00:00Z