Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
about
Multimodality Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease: Focus on Computed TomographyThe Prognosis of Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease Versus Normal Arteries Determined by Invasive Coronary Angiography or Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: A Systematic ReviewImaging Atherosclerosis.Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Plaque StressHow to Utilize Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Treatment of Coronary Artery DiseaseClinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impaComputed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart DiseaseCoronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspectives from the SCOT-HEART TrialThe year in cardiology 2015: imagingCoronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with low-to-intermediate risk chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysisA Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2015: Results and ImplicationsSex differences in cardiovascular disease - Impact on care and outcomes.Non-invasive assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain.Value of Exercise ECG for Risk Stratification in Suspected or Known CAD in the Era of Advanced Imaging TechnologiesMeta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow ReserveCardiovascular Disease in Women: Clinical Perspectives.Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study)ANMCO/GICR-IACPR/SICI-GISE Consensus Document: the clinical management of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathyMyocardial CT perfusion imaging for ischemia detection.Rationale and design of the Randomized Evaluation of patients with Stable angina Comparing Utilization of noninvasive Examinations (RESCUE) trial.An FFRCT diagnostic strategy versus usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease planned for invasive coronary angiography at German sites: one-year results of a subgroup analysis of the PLATFORM (Prospective Longitudinal Trial of FThe Challenges of Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease in WomenNoninvasive testing strategies in symptomatic, intermediate-risk CAD patients: a perspective on the "PROMISE" trial and its potential implementation in clinical practice.The PROMISE study: a clear promise for functional stress testing in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.The Prevalence of Clinically Significant Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the Multicenter RegistryDoes ischemia burden in stable coronary artery disease effectively identify revascularization candidates? Ischemia burden in stable coronary artery disease does not effectively identify revascularization candidates.Projected morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses of coronary artery disease in the United States.Quality-of-Life Outcomes With Anatomic Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing Strategies in Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the PROMISE Randomized TrialPrevalence and Associated Clinical Characteristics of Exercise-Induced ST-Segment Elevation in Lead aVR.Appropriate Use of Cardiac Stress Testing with Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Rationale and Design of the CREDENCE Trial: computed TomogRaphic evaluation of atherosclerotic DEtermiNants of myocardial IsChEmia.Cardiac CT vs. Stress Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Expert RecommendationsFinding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing?Variability of radiation doses of cardiac diagnostic imaging tests: the RADIO-EVINCI study (RADIationdOse subproject of the EVINCI study).Comparison of the prognostic value of negative non-invasive cardiac investigations in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease-a meta-analysis.The Essentials of Cardiac Computerized Tomography.Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Management in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysisCoronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Chest Pain Admitted to Telemetry: A Randomized Trial.A prognostic scoring system for arm exercise stress testing.
P2860
Q26747757-5691BBEB-2F24-4066-A159-88ECE6FE4683Q26764799-9D61C179-FE46-405C-A7FA-E35FB07D3059Q26764836-48F14A5E-F165-46D4-9EDA-2F2C20AECACCQ26768468-47440D36-2B38-44D2-A66F-6D2B764F58C1Q26772281-72FD0DB1-7A72-41C1-BB58-3DB15353C051Q26795428-24BE76A0-2345-4845-8D77-156FF95943F3Q28066080-D774443D-19F5-4EBD-A0C1-043B4CE96DE2Q28070367-CC2BA1F2-3AF1-45D1-9CB7-50938CB904FAQ28072439-D6538ABE-65CB-43FD-B8C0-E3D0A4C2D6BDQ28076388-5F0CAA38-9437-480F-BA5D-AF123A56DF3BQ28077170-3D0CADE5-1BBA-4707-A939-BA64F231C039Q30234726-6F83EE67-DDD2-4528-B8AF-277C6D283DA0Q30275769-895B4466-8108-4D5C-BF4E-CDBD75955EFFQ30278097-7807E446-A07B-4906-9571-8D0929FEC72AQ30278735-2D09FCE6-A71B-45C8-9B5F-1D727295A878Q30743765-17E296EE-1A0E-4BDC-B18C-B92674432072Q33627836-768EE8DE-EC25-422C-A27A-ABE317B16A21Q33647497-36E7F7E0-AFA0-44CC-8076-5C683166FCAEQ33651031-1CFA0AA3-B675-4E5B-BD4B-A7DC4B1FB9FFQ33724340-3524F904-A90B-4628-A410-F3C02555036FQ33801839-AA65B2E1-665F-49B4-BF6F-5D7A18EE6541Q33917513-A6B7AC9F-2D73-408F-A08C-AD01506DDECAQ35572137-67A55CF4-D2C1-43C7-A60D-EDEAA6AF2E1FQ35656206-7666067B-4318-496B-92FE-4AA81A5AE45DQ35731501-64E5FCF2-1D5A-4682-B838-25ACBD38252AQ35771737-37CB69FB-A93B-46AD-A927-A2C9B29C4F53Q35919631-85B1BD99-223F-4745-A59E-D41D221C8EC8Q36008237-B4333BC8-B1D6-4A15-8B1F-ED9A027D4228Q36088568-40A82398-2FEB-4FA0-8011-D4971B637537Q36106550-A3D993A4-6578-4DA1-AD9F-71C3CA103364Q36156840-56C489FE-3FF2-4C7C-948E-C6D0F8D1121DQ36185492-AF98DBA6-CCC2-40B1-88E0-E9990E6E4ECEQ36200819-987921C6-7364-495D-9F89-9CCB0863D6AFQ36281755-2CA775F4-2360-4177-A885-2B811B5E0F07Q36318640-ECD830D2-E782-4B5E-AE55-73F26840057CQ36363168-3826808E-3E12-426F-A6EF-16593305912CQ36367412-DE2FF147-306E-4257-96F4-7C42683FAC57Q36368248-E237B934-D26B-41FA-AB3F-603729CBC0C6Q36435781-2BF2BFF3-EBE9-4E09-BE86-8B625B5506A2Q36472702-FDF6ED95-C000-4513-A1E3-F8097195F236
P2860
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@ast
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@en
type
label
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@ast
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@en
prefLabel
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@ast
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
@en
P2093
Andrzej S Kosinski
Brendan Cavanaugh
Christopher B Fordyce
Eric J Velazquez
Hussein R Al-Khalidi
James E Udelson
Jason Cole
Lawton S Cooper
Manesh R Patel
P2860
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJMOA1415516
P407
P577
2015-03-14T00:00:00Z