Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel.
about
The BIG 2.04 MRC/EORTC SUPREMO Trial: pathology quality assurance of a large phase 3 randomised international clinical trial of postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk breast cancer.Extracting knowledge from chemical imaging data using computational algorithms for digital cancer diagnosis.Development of an electronic breast pathology database in a community health system.Evaluation environment for digital and analog pathology: a platform for validation studiesValidation of natural language processing to extract breast cancer pathology procedures and results.Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.Pupil diameter changes reflect difficulty and diagnostic accuracy during medical image interpretationImaging-based screening: maximizing benefits and minimizing harms.Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.A Randomized Study Comparing Digital Imaging to Traditional Glass Slide Microscopy for Breast Biopsy and Cancer Diagnosis.High-selectivity cytology via lab-on-a-disc western blotting of individual cells.The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.Reliability of diagnosis from Mohs slides: interpersonal and intrapersonal agreement on basal cell carcinoma presence and histological subtype.Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making.Localization of Diagnostically Relevant Regions of Interest in Whole Slide Images: a Comparative Study.Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?Medical malpractice concerns and defensive medicine: a nationwide survey of breast pathologists.Histological features associated with diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: illustrative cases from the B-Path study.Association between mammographic breast density and histologic features of benign breast disease.Reproducibility of diagnostic criteria associated with atypical breast cytology.Nanoscale imaging of clinical specimens using pathology-optimized expansion microscopy.
P2860
Q30844831-3D47CFAC-F213-41D8-BB53-FE5C9C4EE407Q30961998-E9ACB721-D0BA-45DF-A4E4-B1364E49ECDAQ34077507-EDE3483F-76E3-4375-AC83-BBB5B6B5373DQ35686853-91D9F8FB-3565-48B4-8900-905C09B8B5E7Q35796438-90B27D4C-1CAC-4B9A-AAC9-4F51B590C973Q35893019-338AC1B5-9E94-488F-A7B5-38D81E15D94CQ36067951-3F262978-0AE7-4B6C-B23B-DC036D171EF5Q36366314-41C42860-D639-41C7-868C-AE524F0669A6Q37028119-23DF633B-C882-46AB-9B85-8B936E39A65BQ37340649-A0D23D1C-960A-4435-BBFE-BE436F57E939Q37719841-FA85B47A-5160-48C3-8956-18C2AC8B91ACQ38717762-6E14CC8F-3B6F-498E-8A23-86A29C877D66Q38768759-C5869D9B-A2B0-49BF-B13E-D8D4DDA6F8BEQ38796286-883CAD03-E812-41F2-A040-02B8E0BA55C1Q38801937-C1782C90-ADBC-4042-B39B-4BCE159CB4DFQ38838934-327E9C19-C193-4CD9-AF5B-C519418CA4A6Q39087791-9F47B431-7C9E-4F84-B46C-DD9E31EBFED3Q39870741-2CC5CB51-F71E-4D18-AFE9-F8B941B6F46FQ39932995-8DA71AD8-C365-4CF7-9153-113D9B11DFADQ40443806-C36860F1-584A-45F6-8AB5-18143F8A48FBQ41120602-7E3795F7-8A4E-45E2-B462-118EEA47EC3FQ47117094-DBDE43A7-1448-4C0F-9211-93B5CBF9A2A6Q47134558-46BBE4EA-917C-4CFD-BB92-D5635C2695C6Q47602338-206D0475-9C88-4B7E-91C6-2E21123C1B4DQ47915926-6917522F-1C54-4AAB-8B18-B264F10A50C9
P2860
Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
2014年论文
@zh
2014年论文
@zh-cn
name
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@ast
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@en
type
label
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@ast
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@en
prefLabel
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@ast
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Understanding diagnostic varia ...... expert consensus review panel.
@en
P2093
Berta M Geller
Donald L Weaver
Frances P O'Malley
Joann G Elmore
Kimberly H Allison
Lisa M Reisch
Patricia A Carney
Stuart J Schnitt
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/HIS.12387
P577
2014-04-02T00:00:00Z