Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

about

Histopathology: ditch the slides, because digital and 3D are on show.

P2860

Q48501024-33BC8062-670D-4A69-885B-693200D5333D

P2860

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35941781

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@ast

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@en

type

Item

label

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@ast

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@en

prefLabel

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@ast

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@en

P1476

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

@en

P2093

Christian Daniel Fankhauser

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Cédric Poyet

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Holger Moch

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Marco Randazzo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peter J Wild

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas Hermanns

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tullio Sulser

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

ProCOC: the prostate cancer outcomes cohort study.

Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.

Focal therapy: patients, interventions, and outcomes--a report from a consensus meeting.

Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective.

A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score

Gleason score correlation between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens and prediction of high-grade Gleason patterns: significance of central pathologic review.

Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.

EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.

The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

P2888

s00345-016-1788-4

P304

1481-1490

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00345-016-1788-4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Etienne Xavier Keller

Daniel Eberli

Ashkan Mortezavi

Karim Saba

P577

2016-03-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

26931560

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

about

P2860

P2860

Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698