Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions? - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35951362

about

Pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: considerations for testing.The wide variation of definitions of genetic testing in international recommendations, guidelines and reports Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for investigating chromosomal abnormalities in patients with learning disability: systematic review meta-analysis of diagnostic and false-positive yields.Development and description of GETT: a genetic testing evidence tracking tool.Genetic profiling of newborns: ethical and social issues.Guidance for considering ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment: Application to genetic screening How can the evaluation of genetic tests be enhanced? Lessons learned from the ACCE framework and evaluating genetic tests in the United Kingdom

P2860

Q34499056-D17C3F68-2D6A-4FA4-9524-B7177B7E65CF Q35854546-04C32371-5EAD-4BA9-AE42-9C0074125E23 Q36737126-662D842D-4C61-449C-8D71-9D1E5BEE6341 Q50697702-93330449-2C21-481B-A51E-8181E97A79A8 Q53264827-CD33DD4C-F22C-4D51-B8B6-1BE249E9F60A Q57301910-29B71911-F2F6-4B3D-9CFB-81E1BD4AB228 Q57950555-0D8BD910-FDB1-4933-8133-721AED557CD4

P2860

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35951362

description

2004 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2004年の論文

@ja

2004年論文

@yue

2004年論文

@zh-hant

2004年論文

@zh-hk

2004年論文

@zh-mo

2004年論文

@zh-tw

2004年论文

@wuu

2004年论文

@zh

2004年论文

@zh-cn

name

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@ast

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@en

type

label

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@ast

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@en

prefLabel

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@ast

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@en

P1433

Q35951362-D00D1055-BACB-4198-8D04-7917595DCBE0

P1476

Q35951362-08EBF09E-8E45-4B78-BD4E-115156C92D17

P2093

Q35951362-15DBF1BB-8D4F-43FA-B318-AEDC49D1DE70

Q35951362-857FEBEE-EE79-4015-832A-DBF854503277

Q35951362-D577A3B5-2208-42BD-BC6C-960F2BD62E5E

P2860

Q35951362-1134B908-0FA6-4A6F-BB94-75AF61AF547B

Q35951362-2166DD41-0A4F-420D-95F0-1718BB115799

Q35951362-4113EA19-04B1-47F8-8D61-79C435B5A2F4

Q35951362-5A5D4A66-DDB2-4A7F-BCFA-4E4D309AE0B4

Q35951362-7611352B-0793-4827-8B5F-7466CD59FF00

Q35951362-787FE103-E514-4D8A-BDE6-25C8BD6C4D43

Q35951362-79A66D72-062A-40BA-81D7-C1A5DFA41657

Q35951362-8229156A-03DD-47AD-B311-D57A5E5AD5EF

Q35951362-96C7D7E0-A496-4086-AA44-111C9CC40440

Q35951362-B06DB3C1-9F7E-4FF4-883F-DE533AFA06CC

P2888

Q35951362-BE57499F-5A58-43E8-A62A-3A54BBE7441A

P304

Q35951362-5D97CE88-A192-4068-BC4F-9C19F1072C2A

P31

Q35951362-E0277A5A-AC5D-4DD7-97DB-1C899FCEB804

P356

Q35951362-4708E2E3-3046-417D-A779-2D9CEFBB64BC

P407

Q35951362-424EB269-A108-4872-86D7-A050D118609F

P433

Q35951362-42133C6C-ABA7-4E32-9D91-27FBB698A843

P478

Q35951362-D0B7B87A-2A3A-41F7-9C61-D5E538046D50

P577

Q35951362-C9A5C03B-05D2-4A3E-8D50-16420FF22C8C

P6179

Q35951362-B549AFF1-100D-46EF-8522-42765BD3DA99

P698

Q35951362-CD1A6FC8-36C2-4B9D-B2F8-10F82414D39C

P356

01.GIM.0000144060.84960.36

P1433

Genetics in Medicine

P1476

Genetic tests and their evaluation: can we answer the key questions?

@en

P2093

Mark Kroese

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ron L Zimmern

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Simon Sanderson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation

Tuberous sclerosis complex consensus conference: revised clinical diagnostic criteria

Genetic test evaluation: information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public.

Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review.

Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.

Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.

The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.

Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.

Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.

Latent class analysis in medical research.

P2888

01.gim.0000144060.84960.36

P304

475-480

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1097/01.GIM.0000144060.84960.36

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2004-11-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1002144333

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

15545742

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string