Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
about
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settingsScreening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settingsPRevalence of Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence Surgical Evaluation (P.R.A.I.S.E.): rationale and design of a multi-center cross-sectional study.Self-administered questionnaire versus interview as a screening method for intimate partner violence in the prenatal setting in Japan: a randomised controlled trial.Mental health, demographic, and risk behavior profiles of pregnant survivors of childhood and adult abuseA comparison of the types of screening tool administration methods used for the detection of intimate partner violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Programs for Health Care Professionals.Understanding intimate partner violence and its correlatesClinical utility of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients.Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review.The elusive search for definitive evidence on routine screening for intimate partner violence.Optimal methods to screen men and women for intimate partner violence: results from an internal medicine residency continuity clinic.Intimate Partner Violence Screening Practices in California After Passage of the Affordable Care Act.Structural Vulnerability: Operationalizing the Concept to Address Health Disparities in Clinical Care.Birth Outcomes in Relation to Intimate Partner Violence.In This Issue: Risk and Care Management.
P2860
Q24186358-A8E564E7-5930-4901-A77B-52D560C303C6Q24197796-7F64C9C4-1A1F-44AB-9D7B-85EC41A393A3Q33563158-BDE9C67A-1E4E-4214-9DEC-C54CE5A29287Q33779638-C00EB014-C5DC-4099-A993-C5EFC4888D86Q35038913-43998784-02C1-4720-AF83-442DEB896012Q35068681-F5E6480F-0020-4419-98B7-81E31234CEB5Q36225190-02D64537-FDB8-45BB-B4C8-0EE546EF8896Q36899380-279583BA-B63A-45DC-A9C3-D47A0A29FEE8Q37203698-49D7643C-3E1C-47B4-AB5F-94C4339C3D94Q37208813-3F534C64-62DF-4FEE-A004-4C31AC69E0B8Q37341296-96904C56-BB23-4A7F-B902-279C23E30C38Q39988940-C0597E87-4A18-4050-84ED-0D9118970031Q46226966-A0E1F693-F93C-44E2-A2EA-35C26AA53DA2Q46445774-6D06AB6D-78C7-4B77-91A3-E654E067C133Q47206991-5B523E43-3841-4B8E-8B08-5BC4CF5CA0E8Q55464879-0EEF5998-A5B2-443F-9E1B-546085B4A4FA
P2860
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@ast
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@en
type
label
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@ast
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@en
prefLabel
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@ast
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Randomized comparison of 3 methods to screen for domestic violence in family practice.
@en
P2093
Abbie Jacobs
Judy Washington
Marielos Vega
Mark S Johnson
Ping-Hsin Chen
P2860
P304
P356
10.1370/AFM.716
P407
P577
2007-09-01T00:00:00Z