The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
about
Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgeryShifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal SurgeryWhat Are the Best Questionnaires To Capture Anorectal Function After Surgery in Rectal Cancer?Polydextrose and soluble corn fiber increase five-day fecal wet weight in healthy men and women.Long-term outcome after laparoscopic bowel resections for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a single-center experience after 900 casesSerum chemerin levels are independently associated with quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: A pilot study.A prospective case control study of functional outcomes and related quality of life after colectomy for neoplasia.Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review.Sphincter preservation in distal CT2N0 rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.Limited segmental rectal resection in the treatment of deeply infiltrating rectal endometriosis: 10 years' experience from a tertiary referral unitEffect of preoperative radio(chemo)therapy on long-term functional outcome in rectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reliability and validity of a survey to measure bowel function and quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivorsThe psychological context of quality of life: a psychometric analysis of a novel idiographic measure of bladder cancer patients' personal goals and concerns prior to surgeryDevelopment of an online library of patient-reported outcome measures in gastroenterology: the GI-PRO database.Patient expectations of functional outcomes after rectal cancer surgery: a qualitative study.Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial.Complications among colorectal cancer survivors: SF-6D preference-weighted quality of life scoresPatient-reported outcomes in gastroenterology: clinical and research applications.Evaluation of mode equivalence of the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument, LASA Quality of Life, and Subjective Significance Questionnaire items administered by Web, interactive voice response system (IVRS), and paper.Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls.Sexual Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Rectal Cancer Survivors.Men's experience with sexual dysfunction post-rectal cancer treatment: a qualitative studyTransanal Endoscopic Operation for Benign Rectal Lesions and T1 Carcinoma.Participation in Activities Associated With Quality of Life for Long-Term Survivors of Rectal CancerBiofeedback therapy for symptoms of bowel dysfunction following surgery for colorectal cancer.A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.Measuring symptoms in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments.Outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer.Transanal endoscopic surgery: past, present and future.The functional results of radical rectal cancer surgery: review of the literature.Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey.Bowel function and quality of life after local excision or total mesorectal excision following chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.Clinical application of the LARS score: results from a pilot study.Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life.Anterior resection syndrome--a risk factor analysis.Development, reliability and validation of a neurogenic bowel dysfunction score in pediatric patients with spina bifida.Coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon's pride or the patient's quality of life?Treatments for invasive carcinoma of the cervix: what are their impacts on the pelvic floor functions?
P2860
Q26752917-0D9A842D-DA6D-473F-90E7-65958F0CDCB2Q28082769-7AFD5B7A-89FC-422F-8689-72E9B703C807Q28085690-2C11E401-4031-4FB7-B514-C09DFBEE95A4Q33457219-C56F70E5-7E7B-4F95-A06F-49DC6B727E51Q33615621-92475DFB-6ECD-47BF-A0AA-BE4939E363B8Q33643052-C65F5070-4393-4510-9981-B5E33CB6A412Q33689925-F934E05A-6BBF-4008-B587-3E14AB5D447EQ34422988-F01370C3-9E7E-4199-BCA2-1866CD8D9408Q34429876-E323E5C8-3F97-4098-998A-9A12B79D02F0Q34447520-2633D7A6-0D7D-4D52-9987-E6040599A4CEQ34523318-CF36D01B-6B2C-464F-AC55-F53727DB7F63Q34536680-5548D00F-7334-410B-A068-D585F519CFB6Q34610702-411A751B-541A-4C82-8139-072968B24400Q34764154-5A7A06B0-9B73-47C6-B773-2461EC1DF818Q34780361-D7689EB4-58A5-499C-B8CB-03B4262CB8FFQ36348179-6A1CC5F4-FE5D-44E4-A897-8FAAD0423645Q36415874-94B86818-A7B0-447B-AEBF-14DE6D85461DQ36817391-D57EE620-B923-4EFD-A5B0-B2BA8D11DA50Q36827360-3CC6CD11-33C5-47EE-9C91-4D43480BED8BQ36940476-5C82603F-8A71-4951-9BAF-064DFD9DBCCDQ37027621-ED284F58-27DA-49AE-82C9-2AB300419EB0Q37126321-ACC85FF6-7F6C-4F9B-BCE9-5FC8BD3DE5E0Q37606906-7225F430-5E7F-423A-B0ED-01D079494E86Q37616693-D638D9EE-42A5-4AF9-95C5-F4504E381833Q37900899-9296268A-8881-4F56-BEA1-E9BEFB7FAB71Q38113520-562D3ECA-A0B7-457B-AB30-8D5A19FC7335Q38205466-990FC80D-7E38-4B6D-B7DB-680114C913ECQ38215310-EFCCF835-93DE-44A7-B9F5-CE125EE17955Q38223043-B5F8B4A8-AC7F-4B02-8046-C4EE5EEC0F39Q38844271-7B86BAA5-2142-401D-B233-1D7785D7080FQ38888314-99A030D4-15C6-4EBB-8F74-DC15B75462CDQ39282248-A865696E-38F7-4CB0-B8A4-F1AC50D49A13Q39319981-A684396A-7C6C-4ADB-98D3-D4F7D6DE3F2DQ39371578-6940F9D2-4884-4EEB-9977-4F4DAE6AB484Q40504199-C4009D63-D600-4304-8235-E4B347261824Q43314599-22B731C3-8DB8-4892-9748-BE577AEC6490Q43324682-4C34C447-602F-4837-BF19-E478DF956DE2Q43325313-65881DE7-B5DB-45E2-8684-2AE3629878D8Q43353307-36B31FA3-F6BD-4A1D-A8AF-EC1F90BD9E93Q43411182-C2DCE7FD-E103-4D7B-8CA4-1AEF9DBFD11A
P2860
The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@ast
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@en
type
label
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@ast
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@en
prefLabel
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@ast
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@en
P2093
P1476
The development of a validated ...... ing surgery for rectal cancer.
@en
P2093
Bruce D Minsky
Deborah Schrag
Howard T Thaler
Jennifer Bacik
José G Guillem
Larissa K Temple
Lester Gottesman
Martin R Weiser
Michelle Kalman
Philip B Paty
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S10350-004-0942-Z
P577
2005-07-01T00:00:00Z