Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
about
MRI of the wrist at 7 tesla using an eight-channel array coil combined with parallel imaging: preliminary results.Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) of the wrist and finger at 3T: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression images.MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.Does cartilage volume or thickness distinguish knees with and without mild radiographic osteoarthritis? The Framingham Study.How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations?Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score).Non-invasive MRI assessment of the articular cartilage in clinical studies and experimental settingsSingle-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results.Osteoarthritis of the knee at 3.0 T: comparison of a quantitative and a semi-quantitative score for the assessment of the extent of cartilage lesion and bone marrow edema pattern in a 24-month longitudinal study.Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.Loading of the knee during 3.0T MRI is associated with significantly increased medial meniscus extrusion in mild and moderate osteoarthritis.Subjects with higher physical activity levels have more severe focal knee lesions diagnosed with 3T MRI: analysis of a non-symptomatic cohort of the osteoarthritis initiativeComparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee.Assessment of cartilage-dedicated sequences at ultra-high-field MRI: comparison of imaging performance and diagnostic confidence between 3.0 and 7.0 T with respect to osteoarthritis-induced changes at the knee jointMagnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.Ultra-high field upper extremity peripheral nerve and non-contrast enhanced vascular imaging.In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T field strengthA comparative analysis of 7.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and histology measurements of knee articular cartilage in a canine posterolateral knee injury model: a preliminary analysis.Magnetic resonance imaging in teenagers and young adults with limited haemophilic arthropathy: baseline results from a prospective study.Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patellofemoral Chondromalacia: Is There a Role for T2 Mapping?Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 3 and 7 tesla: a comparison using dedicated multi-channel coils and optimised 2D and 3D protocols.Clinical Feasibility of Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Internal Derangements of the Knee.Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee
P2860
Q30476722-E5023F09-384C-4B3E-BD0B-2AC17D5C40EBQ30558690-61626E65-E7F7-44F7-9DBF-0AC6D68D299EQ30661387-E006919E-EFDB-4D64-B371-8F286FE6EB77Q30864329-EE7D8C88-7757-47A4-B676-A7294EB949EDQ33405690-40A1000B-F7FB-4FDA-B6D0-689F054EEEEAQ33625420-CE44BFDC-D3F6-4C1D-B809-50DA4AA05C44Q33758555-0D8BC1C8-95EC-42BE-8333-34028FD09EE2Q34391696-6946218D-B8CE-4F3B-A1EE-5547A96AB954Q34564321-269A91A6-2E5A-497D-84FD-1D5D75B4B194Q35940462-51558870-F291-4D62-A0E3-B617CC0E16FEQ36059524-6F0A389B-274E-45BD-9C25-7FBA7616CA6CQ36101153-2AFD4EF9-1714-4555-9230-93A0C4211E6BQ36823039-1E28FF33-2937-433F-8B2D-C5901A179A82Q37248374-D67D7C11-9121-4080-B0CE-152A453F5CFEQ37248386-A3B25843-4902-431A-955B-2B8C354FA0B3Q37781434-C6CC57C7-FDCB-4690-BBF4-872F16EC8C44Q40482307-9BD05B94-1EBB-4D5A-BD24-7AB2DDEF9DBFQ41893532-3CC15D1A-E956-4D08-A944-6B72BF7494A3Q44004826-03FA9C0B-0C8A-4950-B079-1FE8DED4A146Q45868692-6C3D3948-C9D0-456D-ABC1-4EF51B38C5EEQ46743229-3873EB19-37E0-45F2-AC76-43A87CD2F689Q51374645-E44E6392-A65C-4CCD-B0AA-F04B3A2B7BEFQ55334284-44D48CD4-7BF2-46ED-8024-0C695D921E2DQ56839501-CFEF166A-61B8-4AD9-9EAC-047E6473B5C4
P2860
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@ast
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@en
type
label
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@ast
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@en
prefLabel
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@ast
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
@en
P2093
Catherine Phan
Christian A Sell
David Newitt
Jeffrey N Masi
Lynne Steinbach
Sharmila Majumdar
Thomas M Link
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2361040747
P407
P577
2005-07-01T00:00:00Z