Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

about

Contributions of Peer Support to Health, Health Care, and Prevention: Papers from Peers for Progress.

P2860

Q43170613-01E72CA7-E9A9-48F9-873D-CEC736D0E884

P2860

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36287818

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年学术文章

@wuu

2015年学术文章

@zh-cn

2015年学术文章

@zh-hans

2015年学术文章

@zh-my

2015年学术文章

@zh-sg

2015年學術文章

@yue

2015年學術文章

@zh

2015年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@ast

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@en

type

Item

label

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@ast

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@en

prefLabel

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@ast

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@en

P1476

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

@en

P2093

David Simmons

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Edwin B Fisher

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fred Nakwagala

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Guadalupe X Ayala

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jonathan Graffy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent.

How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US

The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?

Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: local costs without local context.

Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research

Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope.

Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?

P304

S79-86

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1370/AFM.1803

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P478

13 Suppl 1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Christopher Bunn

Michaela A. Riddell

Monika M Safford

P577

2015-08-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

281287740

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26304976

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

research ethics

ethical review

P932

4648134

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

about

P2860

P2860

Challenges in the Ethical Review of Peer Support Interventions.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932