Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.
about
Anterior cervical fusion with a bio-resorbable composite cage (beta TCP-PLLA): clinical and radiological results from a prospective study on 20 patients.Stand-alone cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of high-degree degenerative disc disease: design of a new device for an "old" technique. A prospective study on a series of 116 patients.Extension CT scan: its suitability for assessing fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.Results after anterior-posterior lumbar spinal fusion: 2-5 years follow-up.Co-registration of Sequential Multidetector Computed Tomography Studies for the Evaluation of Surgical Instrumentation following Resection of Spinal Tumors.The Memory Metal Spinal System in a Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) Procedure: A Prospective, Non-Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance.Interobserver agreement in fusion status assessment after instrumental desis of the lower lumbar spine using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: impact of observer experienceThe in vitro stabilising effect of polyetheretherketone cages versus a titanium cage of similar design for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.CT-based classification of long spinal allograft fusionAnterior cervical fusion with interbody cage containing beta-tricalcium phosphate augmented with plate fixation: a prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up.Post-discectomy syndrome treated with lumbar interbody fusion.Reliability analysis of radiographic methods for determination of posterolateral lumbossacral fusion.Anterior cervical fusion for radicular-disc conflict performed by three different procedures: clinical and radiographic analysis at long-term follow-upA radiological comparison of anterior fusion rates in anterior lumbar interbody fusion.Outcomes of Demineralized Bone Matrix Enriched with Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate in Lumbar Fusion.Results of lumbar spondylodeses using different bone grafting materials after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Interspinous Fastener Provides Comparable Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate to Pedicle Screws.Common surgical complications in degenerative spinal surgery.Morphological analysis of interbody fusion following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages using computed tomographyA comparison of radiostereometric analysis and computed tomography for the assessment of lumbar spinal fusion in a sheep model.Multi-Rod Constructs Can Prevent Rod Breakage and Pseudarthrosis at the Lumbosacral Junction in Adult Spinal Deformity.Clinical outcomes and considerations of the lumbar interbody fusion technique for lumbar disk disease in adolescents.The compression of L5 nerve root, single or double sites?-radiographic graded signs, intra-operative detect technique and clinical outcomes.Comparison of unilateral pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion with PEEK cage vs. standalone expandable fusion cage for the treatment of unilateral lumbar disc herniation
P2860
Q33972744-8D56FE03-3BEE-431F-8CFC-9A5A2136B54CQ34918404-62A8540C-C730-43D4-8DD3-E31985938682Q35220742-28DE4964-AC62-47C0-922F-D1854D2903A4Q35916373-499805CF-D1DD-4F16-9A46-6AA8AE8413B3Q35952913-2B0D925E-116E-448D-981B-D9729DC24D8DQ36067339-B12AAF2B-F4F2-48A9-B96D-92B3716D204CQ36295760-C4B4959C-34C3-4D20-A9F4-8540A246C291Q36372096-931B38FD-9A47-4208-BC48-06D0779FDE0CQ36421189-9557234A-68B6-4ED1-BE03-2068464E13E8Q36632683-45E57644-CA73-42E6-96AD-188BF61FA979Q36867057-4D8A9EBF-E7FC-4B87-ACF6-A4AD8D1B5A9CQ36963131-8ACEE964-CE2A-48BE-B52F-6DC18AE219C2Q37313818-5B0969E7-C39A-4526-8CE8-14FB1D717FFAQ37395415-03D2838E-23B9-4FAE-981E-C5A9C51B6B5FQ37458739-5D583B04-EACF-4535-B73D-46C64BF737CBQ38374237-C292850A-6284-4323-BBEF-0E138A1129AEQ38763859-CBD40B56-B939-413A-9AE0-3749A0620357Q39983564-F93C6F2C-8DAD-45AA-A526-A0C2BCBF3AD0Q41523770-11259C6C-7AD4-40AB-8C74-A6E76CD398C3Q42873331-5B64E94C-63FA-4742-9004-73DFAD79371EQ50143946-5D099AAC-0DB0-4E84-BB3F-A0DE960E68CEQ53114915-24B8C6DE-0E98-49A8-B52A-40C4D688CD65Q55253802-2322347B-F932-4846-BFE4-3D1CD3C74B4AQ58588434-73A7017B-F8BC-4134-BE24-B03569DC56BE
P2860
Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
2003年學術文章
@zh
2003年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@ast
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@en
type
label
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@ast
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@ast
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comparison of plain radiograph ...... ranspedicular instrumentation.
@en
P2093
Asif Saifuddin
Benjamin A Taylor
Rajesh R Shah
Saeed Mohammed
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-002-0517-4
P577
2003-05-07T00:00:00Z