A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.
about
Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and futureSurgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosisNonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudicationLumbar spinal stenosisThe evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviewsPhysical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic reviewMotion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizonsRole of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.Grade 1 spondylolisthesis and interspinous device placement: removal in six patients and analysis of current dataLow back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions.The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.Only fixation for lumbar canal stenosis: Report of an experience with seven cases.The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint painDoes Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: potential impact of dynamic stabilization based on imaging analysis.Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosisStabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study.Interspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and Aperius devicesThe mildĀ® procedure: a systematic review of the current literature.Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series.Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacerInterspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review. A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2004.Psychometric Assessment of the Japanese Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ): Reliability and Validity.The interspinous spacer: a clinicoanatomical investigation using plastination.Efficacy of interspinous device versus surgical decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a modified network analysisHigh failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis.Interspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justified.Self-rated evaluation of outcome of the implantation of interspinous process distraction (X-Stop) for neurogenic claudicationA survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.Biomechanical evaluation of the X-Stop device for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instabilityInterspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the Medicare population.The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice.
P2860
Q21284518-3AE44E45-06A0-46AE-BF4C-38A26C810EF8Q24186340-D6FF037C-8B65-4C4A-ABE4-87D7E8957773Q24199138-F3475A02-EA1C-47F1-A378-939AAD2FDE7FQ24622774-CDBBDDE9-7868-4ECD-831C-60FC35BE2E7EQ26822782-D7573835-5E0F-4E3A-B9DA-743E0E8DFEECQ27009476-110694CD-89F8-47A1-9382-C8385495307AQ28259367-5DA1DC13-D927-4FC3-83D1-B8F4714CA7BDQ30318109-3AD98BF0-CFE6-43DF-9587-4166BE35E07CQ30934874-05FFCAD9-DC96-4631-95B5-94A795165FBEQ33576918-2E3A8160-7FEF-4F88-9AEF-2DAC9352399FQ33589314-2F361CFF-F191-4BA5-837C-3AE6D16DBE95Q33859909-0450200A-4E5B-480E-BC20-5AF5782D550FQ33972069-BCD58967-567B-463F-B725-AA0781CF0CD2Q33973266-3BC39EB5-1540-4362-9585-5267B816260CQ33973284-EA3AEB68-CED7-4025-954B-73E688B3C41CQ33973331-0C936C26-07C2-40E1-B9FF-F60C6B23AD2EQ34619126-2474DA0B-E5AC-408D-8DE2-43FF1BA66BA3Q34918505-014B25D1-47E9-4EA4-88CA-9C5162D70BFAQ34918584-66E63CD1-518B-4C26-9E47-65F6DD5C67C2Q35059516-A7FD7DE1-6945-4E5E-92A7-B8CA5D21CE95Q35206955-800893BF-B45F-4677-B4AE-337D6B10B427Q35214097-ED94F37D-70DF-43E0-B269-EE221A08C27AQ35220620-07DA3499-F9FE-4D7A-BD48-7BF305C5DC89Q35233368-3E00154F-9182-459B-92D4-92A1181C3FD4Q36017644-2657B250-ED35-483C-B885-8BE9B8BE7347Q36023017-C771837F-3D05-4D5A-9A28-8480EE97949EQ36088491-CF3BC9F4-FA56-4B03-9ED7-975359CF8B88Q36151941-D6E4426D-CA12-40BA-99FF-2983F0177FF5Q36190245-43210C0F-42AD-4528-9F5B-6EEF3593C6F5Q36429032-F5E78075-07C8-4786-9A3E-4E05B3D91100Q36627273-670B3245-7E35-45DE-8034-366E48F2AF97Q36627531-394628C4-C381-4373-A8B7-4D3E1C4D8496Q36627560-94F3D25A-4AB6-41BF-AC96-46A01FBA7A45Q36783887-324E6FD8-69BF-4029-B910-063DC82FC00BQ36843280-DD60D130-A520-4B55-BA3A-8F11F703E793Q37087316-04E0DBC1-8E3B-4DA2-8A1D-43E3689C61F5Q37182471-2138F205-8A3A-4107-A6FD-261B5DEFC5E4Q37220400-7A8A20AC-DE78-456E-B6B0-6E54F1A5EF4EQ37374006-AF7CFD72-FE03-4935-96EC-8876E012D493Q37466306-65AA6514-67A8-4E46-9484-016CA6375477
P2860
A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.
description
2003 nĆ® lÅ«n-bĆ»n
@nan
2003幓ć®č«ę
@ja
2003幓å¦ęÆęē«
@wuu
2003幓å¦ęÆęē«
@zh-cn
2003幓å¦ęÆęē«
@zh-hans
2003幓å¦ęÆęē«
@zh-my
2003幓å¦ęÆęē«
@zh-sg
2003幓åøč”ęē«
@yue
2003幓åøč”ęē«
@zh
2003幓åøč”ęē«
@zh-hant
name
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@ast
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@en
type
label
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@ast
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@en
prefLabel
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@ast
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
A prospective randomized multi ...... inous implant: 1-year results.
@en
P2093
C A Hartjen
D A Implicito
D R Johnson
G A Skidmore
J C Cauthen
J F Zucherman
M J Martin
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1007/S00586-003-0581-4
P577
2003-12-19T00:00:00Z