Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

about

Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies

P2860

Q58782654-9696F0FA-9E4E-4C4F-9717-ADEF780DB261

P2860

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36337697

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@ast

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@en

type

Item

label

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@ast

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@en

prefLabel

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@ast

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@en

P1476

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

@en

P2093

Branden Carr

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gregory Cook

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Halie Muckelrath

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Laura Varney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matt Vassar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matthew Weiher

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Philip Marcus Sinnett

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Vadim Yerokhin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality

Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review

Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?

Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey

Five large Chinese biomedical bibliographic databases: accessibility and coverage.

When is a search not a search? A comparison of searching the AMED complementary health database via EBSCOhost, OVID and DIALOG.

Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies.

Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.

Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed.

The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.

P304

156-164

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/HIR.12176

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Matt Vassar

P577

2017-04-06T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28383159

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

Base de dados

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

about

P2860

P2860

Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P921

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P921