Fragmentectomy versus Conventional Microdiscectomy in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations : Comparison of Clinical Results and Recurrence Rates.

about

Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature Comparison of discectomy versus sequestrectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

P2860

Q26998488-96B3A833-A1D9-4664-AE91-C1DF35859510 Q35224824-3C94A17E-C92C-4E90-8A59-56F62FC8461B

P2860

Fragmentectomy versus Conventional Microdiscectomy in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations : Comparison of Clinical Results and Recurrence Rates.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36354093

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年学术文章

@wuu

2012年学术文章

@zh-cn

2012年学术文章

@zh-hans

2012年学术文章

@zh-my

2012年学术文章

@zh-sg

2012年學術文章

@yue

2012年學術文章

@zh

2012年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@ast

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@en

type

Item

label

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@ast

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@en

prefLabel

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@ast

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@en

P1476

Fragmentectomy versus Conventi ...... Results and Recurrence Rates.

@en

P2093

Geum-Seong Baek

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

In-Hwan Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jae-Wook Song

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Min-Cheol Lee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sang-Kyu Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yeon-Seong Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Small bowel injury as a complication of lumbar microdiscectomy : case report and literature review

Reherniation and failure after lumbar discectomy: a comparison of fragment excision alone versus subtotal discectomy.

An evidence-based review of the literature on the consequences of conservative versus aggressive discectomy for the treatment of primary disc herniation with radiculopathy.

Vascular and visceral injuries associated with lumbar disc surgery: medicolegal implications.

"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.

Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc.

A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect.

Success of simple sequestrectomy in lumbar spine surgery depends on the competence of the fibrous ring: a prospective controlled study of 168 patients.

Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 1: evaluation of clinical outcome.

Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

P304

210-214

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3340/JKNS.2012.52.3.210

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2012-09-30T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

232746212

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23115663

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3483321

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Fragmentectomy versus Conventional Microdiscectomy in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations : Comparison of Clinical Results and Recurrence Rates.

about

P2860

P2860

Fragmentectomy versus Conventional Microdiscectomy in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations : Comparison of Clinical Results and Recurrence Rates.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P5875

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P5875

P698

P932