Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy.
about
Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion.Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.Haemostatic activation and inflammatory response after three methods of treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence.Comparison of postoperative values for C-reactive protein in minimally invasive and open lumbar spinal fusion surgery.Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomesWhat were the advantages of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation comparing with open discectomy: a meta-analysis?Results of arthrospine assisted percutaneous technique for lumbar discectomy.Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability.Passive mechanical properties of the lumbar multifidus muscle support its role as a stabilizer.Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Modified muscle-sparing paraspinal approach for stabilization and interlaminar decompression: a minimally invasive technique for pedicle screw-based posterior nonfusion stabilization.Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases.Postoperative Kinetics of C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sediment Rate in One-, Two-, and Multilevel Posterior Spinal Decompressions and Instrumentations.Posterior endoscopic discectomy: Results in 300 patients.Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period.The State of the Art in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.Standard open microdiscectomy versus minimal access trocar microdiscectomy: results of a prospective randomized study.Mayo International Spine Symposium 2010.
P2860
Q33972717-0E7C1749-BA11-4F2D-AF29-09224D6601B6Q34562395-E8FB56A1-306A-441C-8862-5ABBC3FE0CA1Q34597083-275ED496-3508-4635-A137-9B80D4E7BAB1Q35088647-3A70CD43-BF2B-46B9-8CCF-15F01F272603Q35194189-495BCE2F-1196-4C5C-82C2-83291D833208Q35894871-D579381B-A3F0-4BA3-9F14-30012EA7C2E2Q36947411-1A41A0A1-FE6B-4431-BC23-AF9C3C8417DEQ37145430-A2FD1A01-37D3-4640-97A7-F4F5D6A60DC1Q37363825-F40A55E9-8B49-4895-9B2D-9276429E850EQ38179971-6FA84EA4-4001-436A-8691-EAA0D2C763BFQ38388709-787B640A-2FA9-4DAE-81B2-C8DC81AF3692Q40079463-8A18925D-57C0-4B11-A360-7340006E7194Q40091817-5697B9DC-4A2C-4635-8CBE-E90660E27748Q40798272-58559F84-ED0A-4752-B37B-32D5F66DEFC8Q42141686-BD284957-4800-437B-84F9-59D9CA5006D7Q42316462-931BD41E-F884-4382-94FD-B9B31A6A3C9EQ42646415-4D251FEB-8144-4B4C-8B4F-E9822ABD3210Q51144732-E323BFFB-C1B2-4A61-B61E-1D840263B2D0
P2860
Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@ast
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@en
type
label
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@ast
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@en
prefLabel
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@ast
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Objective assessment of reduce ...... entional one-level laminotomy.
@en
P2093
Eisuke Suzuki
Hidetomi Terai
Hiroaki Nakamura
Kunio Takaoka
Ryuichi Nagayama
Ryuichi Sasaoka
Sadahiko Konishi
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-005-0912-8
P577
2005-05-31T00:00:00Z