Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
about
Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writingMedical school 2.0: How we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning.An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysisComparison in the quality of distractors in three and four options type of multiple choice questions.Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: A cautionary tale.A comparison of student performance on discipline-specific versus integrated exams in a medical school course.Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.Use of the NBME Comprehensive Basic Science Examination as a progress test in the preclerkship curriculum of a new medical school.Toward a better judgment of item relevance in progress testing.Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71.Medical students' vs. family physicians' assessment of practical and logical values of pathophysiology multiple-choice questions.Best practices in summative assessment.
P2860
Q30634318-E16B08FF-5429-4503-87A7-F74CE01775ADQ33456903-43DE9AA1-7F9F-40EA-B1E7-F06BEBACEA51Q33478751-01F4C4F4-262B-4A24-9AE9-1006DB2ED9F8Q33574820-E982F2B6-CF53-4A28-BCF2-A35ACBF5A11DQ37617301-AD7C7A57-3174-4CF8-94AD-7CF636F7C606Q38167650-F2936482-195B-43BD-811A-27B362B936CEQ39012093-7DF52A31-A44D-419A-A58C-76CB525978C1Q39092601-71FDE7FE-D70D-4A42-B712-D3B180C52EF4Q41613361-83D255C8-13A9-4C69-9BAF-AD18F19692A1Q42706694-E69BE58C-916E-4BAC-B815-33FFDC0DB637Q45168269-5DC93031-6BD2-43F2-8110-8D95B8380438Q47448501-0DF05C47-626D-403E-B413-DBB5A3346C00Q50456297-95CDFA7C-92A8-4AAD-8F70-120C649C0683
P2860
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@ast
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@en
type
label
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@ast
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@en
prefLabel
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@ast
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@en
P2093
P1476
Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations.
@en
P2093
Galbraith RM
Holtzman KZ
Swanson DB
Wallach PM
P2888
P356
10.1007/S10459-004-7515-8
P577
2006-02-01T00:00:00Z