Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.
about
Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraceptionTwenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraceptionThe contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learnedContraceptive use following spontaneous and induced abortion and its association with family planning services in primary health care: results from a Brazilian longitudinal studyContraceptive care at the time of medical abortion: experiences of women and health professionals in a hospital or community sexual and reproductive health context.Access to Contraceptives in Countries With Restrictive Abortion Laws: The Case of Brazil.Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE ProjectContinuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placementThe association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland.A trauma-informed examination of the hardships experienced by abortion fund patients in the United States.Contraception for adolescents after abortion.Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.Aspiration Abortion With Immediate Intrauterine Device Insertion: Comparing Outcomes of Advanced Practice Clinicians and Physicians.Roles of the pharmacist in the use of safe and highly effective long-acting reversible contraception: an opinion of the women's health practice and research network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.Contraceptive Use over Five Years After Receipt Or Denial of Abortion Services.Telephone or integrated contraception counselling before abortion: impact on method choice and receiptContraception after Abortion and Risk of Repeated Unintended Pregnancy among Health Plan Members
P2860
Q24202496-A8758BB6-21CE-4869-811E-127DC5FB8983Q33574772-AAE72B0D-5A18-4178-8756-1CEFEBB746B9Q34437661-E6ABA7FC-CFC5-49F6-9DC2-4BB050DBB939Q36163726-A5C8903E-AAB3-438C-8F6C-3DA217C555EDQ36459950-0960F318-3572-4C62-A72E-9CB649544FA2Q36832918-E7A9DA12-83C4-420A-A492-61A32E4BD3B6Q36864173-C83ABD97-B1C7-44F4-91F4-488CAD38D503Q37012754-F5D5DFF2-5880-4000-99E3-81AE4751961BQ37107403-166E2C24-E751-45A2-A125-C22B7A5FBA8AQ38603944-FD9F7817-B840-4247-98A6-4708986930D6Q38606294-B046A4C4-FDF4-478A-8000-54735F88560EQ38918133-F20ADB2C-5410-4F60-8DA7-7174B5B3718AQ39925966-78B6FD32-28F7-4861-9456-322F943A44D8Q45937153-EA5E1D62-E45E-4136-85F3-24C01058D8ADQ47554158-CA997E12-9084-46F6-B776-52E037A2691FQ58224280-30903AC0-871C-4325-8503-51319460AB32Q58754028-AF2A4955-5DE9-4393-A4AA-8F47E34BCB91
P2860
Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
2011年论文
@zh
2011年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@ast
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@en
type
label
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@ast
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@ast
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Comparison of contraceptive me ...... t history of induced abortion.
@en
P2093
Gina M Secura
Jeffrey F Peipert
Tessa Madden
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2011.03.018
P577
2011-05-04T00:00:00Z