The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
about
Interventions for improving upper limb function after strokeSensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviewsIndustry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusionsBuilding PROMIS item banks: librarians as co-investigators.Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines: an overview.Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?Methodological rigour and transparency of clinical practice guidelines developed by neurology professional societies in Croatia.Compared with what? An analysis of control-group types in Cochrane and Campbell reviews of psychosocial treatment efficacy with substance use disordersMethodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews.Survey of the application of the korean clinical practice recommendations on breast cancer treatment: the utility of the korean breast cancer society guidelines.A primer on critical care pharmacy services.Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors.The quality of meta-analyses of genetic association studies: a review with recommendations.Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: past and future.Bisphenol A and indicators of obesity, glucose metabolism/type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of epidemiologic research.Do phthalates act as obesogens in humans? A systematic review of the epidemiological literature.Factors influencing citations to systematic reviews in skin diseases: a cross-sectional study through Web of Sciences and Scopus.Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity.Interventions for sustained healthcare professional behaviour change: a protocol for an overview of reviews.Do guidelines for treating chest disease in children use Cochrane Reviews effectively? A systematic review.Do Cochrane reviews provide useful information to guide policy and practice? The experience of the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group
P2860
Q24202813-61C9A644-8597-485D-BD8A-4BF5EFFA02E0Q26866297-23B886D3-CC90-4E97-9A12-B1FC1AE9B6B8Q33368267-31555628-F8DE-4A23-B2DE-04F237D3FF45Q33472775-5B15A0BF-BB92-4C49-A633-FF421531202DQ33814405-DABF555A-785E-45A9-938B-DA50683526FCQ34103290-E76B5A89-51E9-4D72-8CEA-B93F8A77448CQ34510579-72516A99-814B-4E34-88F2-2397D8BA53EBQ34874773-5B42B309-D165-4528-85A9-F0794BDB3405Q35218781-F2F13873-1C7C-4F82-AA95-C12E694CA9EDQ35656915-0EC7AB22-89D6-419F-BE43-D4381CA736BBQ35934526-F6F0442D-950E-43BD-BE6E-5744CAC8BF7FQ36092054-964887C6-54D7-4488-A3F8-4BC924EA99EFQ37328821-FF37C787-AF0C-4BF5-8661-A751F0A88DE1Q37357415-FE26DA3D-FD9E-49DF-A1B7-C7BCBB621C03Q37424593-03A6B277-7B5A-4BE1-8060-398218620483Q38106498-BCCD176C-08F6-471A-B372-1D9FE14D6DABQ38120030-948F9E9A-1B46-476E-BE6F-38CC8F57F43FQ38170165-291ED344-39C6-4D84-A0EB-6FE274427750Q38176050-C5D80C56-44AE-4FEC-8CEB-5DE6DE815926Q38177864-B8353105-F587-45FD-9DB3-6A5A50E662CBQ38631180-3482AFF2-12A7-4C5A-939A-5AEED7D3B8BCQ38673534-0BB85069-7E40-4091-9670-B0D34B602653Q38767084-60CBABC3-1FC9-4D47-B57A-6EF708717D99Q38811953-AA679562-6C6E-454B-AD70-4F4809FD0405Q44434456-DACA4E5A-F21D-4152-A0BB-BC9755F1D90BQ57209643-B3660B20-9C5F-4AFC-A9E6-374FF0850E89
P2860
The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@ast
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@en
type
label
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@ast
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@en
prefLabel
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@ast
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@en
P2093
P1476
The quality of reports of crit ...... ews: an independent appraisal.
@en
P2093
Andre Ferland
Anthony Delaney
Braden Manns
Christopher Doig
Sean M Bagshaw
P304
P356
10.1097/01.CCM.0000253394.15628.FD
P407
P577
2007-02-01T00:00:00Z