Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place.
about
Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospitalDetection of medication-related problems in hospital practice: a reviewValidation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse eventsPrescribing errors in hospital practice"Against the silence": development and first results of a patient survey to assess experiences of safety-related events in hospital.Quality of medication use in primary care--mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature.Characterisations of adverse events detected in a university hospital: a 4-year study using the Global Trigger Tool method.Patient safety in out-of-hours primary care: a review of patient records.Preventable adverse drug events and their causes and contributing factors: the analysis of register data.To what extent are adverse events found in patient records reported by patients and healthcare professionals via complaints, claims and incident reports?Performance of different data sources in identifying adverse drug events in hospitalized patients.Does the implementation of an electronic prescribing system create unintended medication errors? A study of the sociotechnical context through the analysis of reported medication incidentsEmergency department patient safety incident characterization: an observational analysis of the findings of a standardized peer review process.Facilitators and barriers influencing patient safety in Swedish hospitals: a qualitative study of nurses' perceptionsUsing structured telephone follow-up assessments to improve suicide-related adverse event detectionA comprehensive overview of medical error in hospitals using incident-reporting systems, patient complaints and chart review of inpatient deaths.Detecting inpatient falls by using natural language processing of electronic medical recordsFactors influencing patient safety in Sweden: perceptions of patient safety officers in the county councils.Prevalence and consequences of patient safety incidents in general practice in the Netherlands: a retrospective medical record review studyRetrospective record review in proactive patient safety work - identification of no-harm incidents.Evaluation of the patient safety Leadership Walkabout programme of a hospital in SingaporeDescription of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool.What are incident reports telling us? A comparative study at two Australian hospitals of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system.Patient safety incident capture resulting from incident reports: a comparative observational analysis.Complaints against family physicians submitted to disciplinary tribunals in the Netherlands: lessons for patient safety.Patients and families as safety experts.The tip of an iceberg? A cross-sectional study of the general public's experiences of reporting healthcare complaints in Stockholm, Sweden.A stepped wedge, cluster controlled trial of an intervention to improve safety and quality on medical wards: the HEADS-UP study protocol.Detecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety IndicatorsA framework to assess patient-reported adverse outcomes arising during hospitalization.ExpIR-RO: A Collaborative International Project for Experimenting Voluntary Incident Reporting In the Public Healthcare Sector in Romania.How Effective Are Incident-Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review.Characteristics of Inpatient Falls not Reported in an Incident Reporting System.Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study.Use of Text Searching for Trigger Words in Medical Records to Identify Adverse Drug Reactions within an Intensive Care Unit Discharge Summary.Detection of adverse events in a Scottish hospital using a consensus-based methodology.Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactionsBeyond FMEA: the structured what-if technique (SWIFT).Adverse events are common on the intensive care unit: results from a structured record review.Informal learning from error in hospitals: what do we learn, how do we learn and how can informal learning be enhanced? A narrative review.
P2860
Q24187331-7DA81F66-BD88-4DEF-B8A5-CFD2F2F9266BQ26825035-EE89D42A-F2CA-4BC9-A98D-ED75B83F3DA5Q26866510-B1680D4E-94E0-47A4-99E8-61852BD97EC5Q27021830-C642F437-4FA4-4386-A5B9-45A207E5E2B1Q33325712-1761A08A-3A03-49D3-90A7-B3BC2051C9D9Q33505780-91FA01F5-D6E4-4BB5-AED3-8314CFA97718Q33691303-3BD6CBF9-B141-4CEF-9B53-0FDBB4128FE4Q33767071-AD53FFF4-1B0E-4C46-B532-95BEDD8D0D6DQ33795548-64229B7E-225E-43D1-AADA-21CEEEC7E9DFQ33830930-579B534F-F0F0-4975-901F-F46EE9A33850Q33843430-E93D4EA5-1C89-4DEA-986A-F8200870AC29Q33898814-E906C07D-9684-4E9D-A251-B1A2AB24B91CQ34042875-0A878753-8F1C-4F8B-B621-70EFA58C9813Q34051816-658CF8EC-69C0-4A04-963C-7B49E62C37CEQ34129556-D6B3236E-7897-4E79-BE2F-0E4371A1FB56Q34168135-75418645-1694-42C5-8351-F7DBAB27BB1AQ34502731-151D1CB3-8C36-42C4-AAE0-B523A9E92C5EQ34580503-4F3D8F65-8E16-4C85-9CF9-A2037D4636F7Q34825996-B1133B17-5D72-4E23-8E79-21EC93F778DAQ34856820-5BCB16F2-AECF-4363-AA82-F93EF3A1C4E5Q34928630-FE0532B3-FDE9-4E60-A8C7-D3C0CFDC9E84Q34935406-5566DE6A-3B26-415B-86F2-64792278E0F3Q35120777-C4638F19-91B3-47E9-B8C0-083E0F3B5933Q35499634-FB9D2507-728D-4136-821D-DEB7A955F17FQ35655046-83B35B8C-FFA2-4CA2-B399-B86C106A50CDQ35664214-C8B522F6-1DF8-43EE-832C-DDEEDC515673Q35714692-A519CC85-5534-4E85-B255-11EE94D92748Q35778818-886ED6D4-4D71-4E27-8002-06E1E8974CBAQ36020028-164ED978-C6FA-40FA-9B5C-E36F9F320F27Q36096197-C1F7EE7C-8657-4BAE-8E2B-A8BC1544320FQ36348988-B33C7929-EEC6-4B00-AC90-A78F579C082FQ36371191-82522207-4C04-4FFB-8B9B-C8BC15F041F7Q36718831-B739B285-3C87-4982-ACCF-F1BE080E7DC7Q36737898-F90E4A3E-63BE-4799-92C4-EC98FC588712Q37314685-C843C507-C238-47F7-BE37-4BEE1F98569EQ37340028-5592475F-6460-4E96-BC8F-79204D0AB796Q37369674-BB440BEE-2A5A-49DD-BDBF-04CCCD5A04ECQ38004997-5DD5514D-D4C0-4156-926E-828BE8480A1EQ38008758-BB248032-D705-423F-81EC-4C302ADCA28CQ38040701-868B9C78-2936-4DD5-B6D9-B2C0B206A62D
P2860
Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@ast
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@en
type
label
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@ast
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@en
prefLabel
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@ast
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Hospital staff should use more ...... d review may all have a place.
@en
P2093
Beth Psaila
Charles Vincent
E Jane Chapman
Graham Neale
Kat Schwab
Sisse Olsen
Tejal Patel
P2860
P356
10.1136/QSHC.2005.017616
P577
2007-02-01T00:00:00Z