A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates.
about
Counseling and consenting women with cancer on their oncofertility options: a clinical perspectiveDebating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive ApproachClinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trialsFactors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of oneThe importance of the cleavage stage morphology evaluation for blastocyst transfer in patients with good prognosis.Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer.Culturing surplus poor-quality embryos to blastocyst stage have positive predictive value of clinical pregnancy rate.Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS)The Desire for Multiple Pregnancy among Patients with Infertility and Their Partners.Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates.Array comparative genomic hybridization screening in IVF significantly reduces number of embryos available for cryopreservation.Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn.Supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation: a key prognostic indicator for patients opting for an elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT).Patient selection criteria for blastocyst transfers in extended embryo culture programs.The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfersVitrification of blastocysts derived from fair to poor quality cleavage stage embryos can produce high pregnancy rates after warming.Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists.Noninvasive chromosome screening of human embryos by genome sequencing of embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization.Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review.Perinatal health services organization for preterm births: a multinational comparison.Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?The effects of fertilization mode, embryo morphology at day 3, and female age on blastocyst formation and the clinical outcomes.Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.Protein expression in human cumulus cells as an indicator of blastocyst formation and pregnancy success.Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015.The epigenetic effects of assisted reproductive technologies: ethical considerations.Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one.The male factor of infertility should not be an issue for the selection of patients for extended embryo culture programmes.Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women?
P2860
Q24625160-2143F683-4BEB-4795-8592-78D2583123C5Q28080756-B34C913A-C9D4-4811-990E-73F02FA66F09Q28744051-DA2B6AE1-D1C8-4E58-8156-FA7DF8B488E8Q33746543-C93C02C5-E6EB-43CA-A43A-899398673A04Q33995725-861C4057-6378-428D-AA54-69848AD1FC13Q34037188-1FA8B840-8C90-47DA-8ADF-5E204C383789Q34126215-2259418F-E268-4346-A256-5D3AAF5322A0Q34589489-A2B2090E-B8C9-4588-86DB-5EA614DEB4A9Q34608686-E38F1DB5-51AB-4F8D-9B29-D15E8CA63E89Q35100099-3DCC7B40-18E5-42CD-AC88-39A35EC57F8AQ35829512-AE1A977C-121A-43C2-AC4A-A660B40B8B2CQ36098499-48DB0844-C264-4479-B6C9-A0DCE11AB583Q36112761-8E710F38-DB1D-450E-A46E-A3263593EB60Q36127688-EE5CC1FE-99D8-4F40-995D-F61E8C09201DQ36198811-DA5145A5-C702-4BD4-90D8-D9D58CC4A993Q36484682-17974B6C-760E-444F-B839-B87AC0A4E585Q36815681-A6542066-57BD-4663-B4E3-F11B652EFC6CQ37214097-E794EC3D-F1E8-4B49-BA42-ADC4F612CAE4Q37259350-676DF0CA-5086-43B9-B3B1-806A565C7F9AQ37369285-F0E12974-4E82-4289-B0C2-FBA070DDC113Q37689134-9C3AA2AD-ADA6-47A1-931F-83BF5B5D8B04Q38850464-11F5D8EE-E283-4F1A-8B68-0B5AFFF3D3FCQ38969629-33B7D37A-BBC2-477B-BF17-D7C754D3B812Q39024784-17178511-7FE2-4316-9484-918D8D2BAEBBQ41601968-490754B5-1E62-4888-BD3A-B2AB2AAED031Q43476409-C73AECF8-3955-419F-B8B0-C5DA720379C3Q46922228-636649AC-E2FD-43D6-889F-AA22A2CABEE3Q49980922-FD152299-52B5-4C7F-A8E5-C21C44B386FEQ50437193-F8962BDD-5178-49C1-9E79-F6BE51CB3745Q50934638-61521E19-CBE3-422A-8CD7-7BD53DAFAD74Q53098878-DF22E33A-0EBA-4E25-8278-A4137289F2B8Q55343517-A8699BD1-33DD-425E-936C-F5E82B9D118C
P2860
A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@ast
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@en
type
label
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@ast
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@en
prefLabel
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@ast
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@en
P2093
P1476
A mandatory single blastocyst ...... t sacrificing pregnancy rates.
@en
P2093
Amy E T Sparks
Anuja Dokras
Bradley J Van Voorhis
Christopher S Sipe
Craig H Syrop
Ginny L Ryan
P304
P356
10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2007.03.001
P407
P577
2007-05-09T00:00:00Z