A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature
about
Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trialsMethodological reporting of randomized trials in five leading Chinese nursing journalsDevelopment of a comprehensive hospital-based elder abuse intervention: an initial systematic scoping reviewAbstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts.Quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in emergency medicine journals: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literatureEpidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals.Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic reviewA comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and mReporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey.Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature.Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials.Reporting quality of stepped wedge design randomized trials: a systematic review protocol.State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol.Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.Poor outcome reporting in medical research; building practice on spoilt grounds.Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol.Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions.Quality of abstracts of pilot trials in heart failure: A protocol for a systematic survey.Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations.Enhancing research publications and advancing scientific writing in health research collaborations: sharing lessons learnt from the trenches.Quality of pilot trial abstracts in heart failure is suboptimal: a systematic survey.Quality of abstracts of randomized control trials in five top pain journals: A systematic survey.Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update
P2860
Q28651692-9851480A-AEF4-4A04-A11B-7493E1702EDAQ35442504-3870601D-1F4E-431B-B809-A6D93F6D718DQ35566825-E03D7935-F883-49E8-82ED-911EC0446296Q36163056-87E579AF-D333-4331-9BD8-5D7113CD433DQ36357098-DED02192-BA6C-43A6-BCB3-E46B7683615FQ36374398-A1FC6406-0882-4BDE-ADBE-89A64E9E8A54Q36971040-50EA0331-7142-4978-BDB7-E361E67AAEA6Q37340837-D1A04992-A19D-4778-8A6B-BDA657F62238Q37454323-B3A06865-F0BF-4C69-8C4D-BA6845BFF068Q37454704-7999A72E-2E47-4C6B-AE9E-7A02E9464B47Q37497972-5069D4CA-809F-4F06-A0D5-7C900E5E5A4BQ38836860-5FCAB7F3-1DDF-4E8A-82D2-A854A41C0855Q39209608-9E02279E-5AC7-4F76-B992-44EFABDBC02CQ39431249-4DA8EC2C-C285-4416-AEA9-34594D1F5489Q42348014-6E5AB887-093E-4217-A097-39E2DC993DC6Q47096680-334958F7-5DBC-45E7-AFA4-FACAAE40D75DQ47159405-0F3D6615-7AD8-4798-9B7C-A726AFA0E0ACQ48148434-3E0355D6-FB2E-4E6E-A2A5-6FC33F39BF92Q53274543-F21B1C2E-779D-4201-A4EA-225D67FF1C50Q54956587-88B07E3B-20B9-487F-8AAF-83F2D4A248ADQ55009572-77AB9203-0F4F-4763-99D4-22EC522141D3Q55028335-79A094EB-5929-4351-B63F-28871FB8D8E7Q55312423-742C5697-55EA-4249-A932-7427076E856AQ55394174-AD0FCC70-5FD9-4B7B-AE56-641B88393D65Q57491117-AE40AB6A-01FD-4AC0-A8CB-B186B35B7DAC
P2860
A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
A systematic scoping review of ...... ines in health care literature
@en
type
label
A systematic scoping review of ...... ines in health care literature
@en
prefLabel
A systematic scoping review of ...... ines in health care literature
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
A systematic scoping review of ...... ines in health care literature
@en
P2093
Brittany Dennis
Daisy Kosa
Rejane Dillenburg
Shiyuan Zhang
Victoria Borg Debono
Vincent Fruci
Zainab Samaan
P2860
P304
P356
10.2147/JMDH.S43952
P577
2013-05-06T00:00:00Z