Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England
about
Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in TaiwanImplementing the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines: a mixed methods study and cluster randomised trial of a model osteoarthritis consultation in primary care--the Management of OsteoArthritis In Consultations (MOSAICS) study protocol.Gender-specific associations of vision and hearing impairments with adverse health outcomes in older Japanese: a population-based cohort studySystematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.A prospective study of mental health care for comorbid depressed mood in older adults with painful osteoarthritisSelf-reported quality of care for older adults from 2004 to 2011: a cohort studyAssessing quality of care of elderly patients using the ACOVE quality indicator set: a systematic reviewEconomic inequalities in burden of illness, diagnosis and treatment of five long-term conditions in England: panel study.'Just another incentive scheme': a qualitative interview study of a local pay-for-performance scheme for primary careDeveloping a model osteoarthritis consultation: a Delphi consensus exercise.Physicians' knowledge of and compliance with guidelines: an exploratory study in cardiovascular diseases.Does the evidence referenced in NICE guidelines reflect a primary care population?Quality of chronic disease care for older people in care homes and the community in a primary care pay for performance system: retrospective study.Hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis in a Norwegian population-based study--the MUST protocol.Monitoring Osteoarthritis: A Cross-sectional Survey in General PracticeQuality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Correlation between prescribing quality and pharmaceutical costs in English primary care: national cross-sectional analysisQuality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template.Potential contribution of aspirin to cancer control programmes.A survey of attitudes to clinical practice guidelines in general and adherence of the Korea practical guidelines for management of gallbladder polyp: a survey among private clinicians in Korea.Self-reported quality care for knee osteoarthritis: comparisons across Denmark, Norway, Portugal and the UKA nurse-led clinic for patients consulting with osteoarthritis in general practice: development and impact of training in a cluster randomised controlled trial.The Identity Crisis of Osteoarthritis in General Practice: A Qualitative Study Using Video-Stimulated Recall.Assessment of the quality of fall detection and management in primary care in the Netherlands based on the ACOVE quality indicators.The influence of time pressure on adherence to guidelines in primary care: an experimental study.Comparative analysis of quality assurance in health care delivery and higher medical education.The virgin land of quality management: a first measure of patient safety climate at the National Hospital of the Faroe Islands.Achievement of treatment goals for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction or stroke in 29,325 patients with type 2 diabetes: a German/Austrian DPV-multicenter analysisCommunity care of vulnerable older people: cause for concern.Cohort profile: the English longitudinal study of ageing.Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory.Osteoarthritis and the rule of halves.Current osteoarthritis treatment, prescribing influences and barriers to implementation in primary care.Assessing appropriateness of osteoarthritis care using quality indicators: a systematic review.Variations in achievement of evidence-based, high-impact quality indicators in general practice: An observational study.Primary care supply and quality of care in England.Quality of Community-Based Osteoarthritis Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Quality of inpatient care in public and private hospitals in Sri Lanka.The quality of outpatient primary care in public and private sectors in Sri Lanka--how well do patient perceptions match reality and what are the implications?Effect of a model consultation informed by guidelines on recorded quality of care of osteoarthritis (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care
P2860
Q30493555-5017B6F2-9F51-48BE-8D6E-E828D842DE04Q30588236-E4F1D400-4927-47C4-8163-43AF78BE5416Q30907523-80A7FFCE-EA9A-4C4F-A05B-34CC8BE4EE84Q33669353-2966DC5D-9421-4071-879D-F28DAE23CACAQ34017143-49ED526E-E71B-4C2D-91FD-99ED2E40D6B9Q34084636-D93F45E8-E35D-418F-B3C7-93A2231277B0Q34110211-B6B6D362-3986-41C7-8FE0-74390CC8DD2CQ34417180-BCB2A4F9-E038-4A70-9EA4-F8B9385B21E7Q34423029-AB873F26-2880-4FB9-8206-59EA99812FABQ34548630-EF3478DD-5154-44EC-8C98-B648C194A0F4Q34565790-4312E1DF-F463-4376-9184-3DAEC2051D04Q34617682-D73F5914-5F02-4CCD-90B9-DC8223E245E6Q34634200-9AD234DE-0EF9-424F-8F30-C37958F56ED6Q34798292-3E35D255-55B7-4CC3-A9F5-FDBB6EAD8E16Q35063597-DA37C457-D0FD-4D05-9DD5-CD7D33EE5BF1Q35136026-1222E794-084D-4DCA-88C2-5EF1B04D7AF0Q35182247-F97280C0-4B79-4C83-B712-CAEA5E91D69CQ35558696-B1083D72-0077-45A4-ADDC-B8DCCCB2733EQ35602238-DACAD8C9-523D-4A3D-885C-94AA458357C4Q35820871-9379E86D-C3E9-4BFC-BB4B-4F4787978783Q36215851-679F8551-DDF7-4108-99AE-604EF4BEC33DQ36230724-DB2B9905-CF35-482D-9D32-BC09365620E0Q36264618-E5C5C46C-E43F-4B61-B439-36F310BF11EFQ36541672-014A764E-3E6A-4088-A8E2-E8AC35872D44Q36810057-FE325D6B-1306-4A04-9BCB-30A5C6CA7F44Q36834056-4304F5AA-E9B3-4180-A55F-A996AFEC742BQ36858177-62ECBA1D-6C17-4270-A3A2-F609212FDDBFQ36867158-31A9EC08-7E96-47DE-B9F3-84B121086F50Q37196806-AD904636-E876-417D-BDE5-210B0D843CE6Q37511412-46F83F5E-3313-4FF5-B0D1-1C820709C3E0Q37698280-EDF90725-17BA-4576-A527-6262EE2D3578Q37706518-E96FCB1E-EDE7-4733-951D-33457BC9E799Q37998628-24D0255A-AF84-43F0-AECC-27EE36243BD8Q38530279-B2A3120F-913D-4C4E-9E08-C0EBCFA650D2Q38680903-F77100C3-EF4F-4D33-9D7F-C881DB2FFB62Q38755060-EF35C38B-8F05-4A8B-B15A-D3F78363C9F9Q38780277-062C106C-35BD-4949-812C-FB11A5B1D62CQ41248739-4C61588A-1D0A-4E0B-BDCD-9A4FA496A4BFQ41684984-D6D28F68-6E4D-48BA-8842-1CCDF707759BQ42364059-F659A90F-38F6-4679-BD16-CF6A518AD558
P2860
Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
2008年论文
@zh
2008年论文
@zh-cn
name
Self reported receipt of care ...... lts aged 50 or more in England
@en
type
label
Self reported receipt of care ...... lts aged 50 or more in England
@en
prefLabel
Self reported receipt of care ...... lts aged 50 or more in England
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1433
P1476
Self reported receipt of care ...... lts aged 50 or more in England
@en
P2093
Elizabeth Breeze
Nicholas Steel
Paul Shekelle
Susan Maisey
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.A957
P407
P577
2008-08-13T00:00:00Z