Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches.
about
Establishing local priorities for a health research agendaUsing Economic Evidence to Set Healthcare Priorities in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks.Clearing up the hazy road from bench to bedside: a framework for integrating the fourth hurdle into translational medicineSustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting.Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking--the EVIDEM framework and potential applications.Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocolPrioritisation criteria for the selection of new diagnostic technologies for evaluation.Choosing health technology assessment and systematic review topics: the development of priority-setting criteria for patients' and consumers' interests.Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma.Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on management of primary angle closure: a survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians.A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approachStakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagementThe health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence.From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmakingEngaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.Health technology assessment: a comprehensive framework for evidence-based recommendations in Ontario.Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH.New technologies and surgical innovation: five years of a local health technology assessment program in a surgical department.Using evaluation theory in priority setting and resource allocation.Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.Implementing a national early awareness and alert system for new and emerging health technologies in Italy: the COTE Project.Markov Models in health care.CHANGING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PARADIGMS?A PROCESS OF PRIORITIZING TOPICS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN.Health technology assessment (HTA) organizations: dimensions of the institutional and political framework.Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.Identification of research gaps from evidence-based guidelines: a pilot study in cystic fibrosis.Economic analysis of bedside ultrasonography (US) implementation in an Internal Medicine department.[Mapping stakeholders' preferences in prioritization criteria for horizon scanning in healthcare technologies].The effect of participatory community-based diabetes cares on the control of diabetes and its risk factors in western suburb of Yasouj, Iran.The Italian Horizon Scanning Project.IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT WORK IN A HOSPITAL IN KAZAKHSTAN.Public drug policy for children in Canada.Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.Developing a prioritized list of innovative technologies: the Spanish experience.Early awareness and alert systems: an overview of EuroScan methods.P&T Committee Drug Prioritization Criteria: A Tool Developed by a Saudi Health Care System.Structures and processes for priority-setting by health-care funders: a national survey of primary care trusts in England
P2860
Q27349497-7AD43E71-3EEF-458D-A54F-72AF6B157A73Q28074172-85123B83-FE24-4614-9CCF-29A0DE29623EQ28756810-33A61100-A249-4FA6-A18F-99865031847EQ30853586-7BF7D208-4617-468D-AA6A-126757D6F0E8Q33395099-A6737A87-A97A-414F-ADAB-E57612B506FBQ33812977-F52EFBEE-0145-4407-84C7-931F01F0BB65Q33895046-0FC37FD7-5F34-4E37-9DBD-067C515D2548Q34049717-012EB525-25ED-4B21-BF8B-3941506E4653Q34159383-36450D48-BFC4-417E-9E58-1FD2A8589C21Q34258967-9FC0BDD7-AA52-40B3-B2E8-0034700D9FF2Q34259383-EE5B96C0-5B20-4B16-AB70-210F615C6301Q34802957-454DD657-BA4E-4166-9836-3AB05F5A2D79Q35986702-6CDF02E5-8576-4F0A-AA3B-80EC05624BA7Q36021512-319B934D-7674-4280-ADFA-DB366AF3BD1BQ36070736-D83B550C-1670-41C7-A0CC-D6F417997B7EQ36390478-164017C2-1620-4ADF-AD46-17B2D4AE5F32Q37332335-D7B666E7-FA15-4D24-A22B-76EADFCB3583Q37444256-A53A7CE2-8662-47CA-B632-4232A49E7AB1Q37768243-399569B5-14EB-449F-9235-AE0192141AF8Q37939046-552FE0C0-73EC-4F0D-A59D-528EDA5D71B0Q38056923-3350CC70-99B4-4196-8285-67E73735C87AQ38117161-4D362DE8-CCBF-4D21-A318-05060AC33D1FQ38413825-ACAE45E9-00D5-4118-8B02-211B79C3237DQ38694427-9EAC6E79-2FB1-41CC-9D2B-EC24241FD527Q38808261-7BAA3094-71B0-475D-A9CE-B28995E5BB33Q38922131-61F7A64D-5814-4B4D-A0A2-E4003B594059Q39003717-C50B1F8E-3DF7-4F20-9518-167FC8235A6CQ39337293-320D7FB9-981D-4F48-8381-343899F8CE84Q39728774-2B24885B-C5BD-4775-B500-957BC9B49796Q40449968-57983647-87C4-4F6A-BB9A-1A806A9D0DAEQ40637839-4CEBCDD8-C680-4EC2-9E09-B3CF815006D2Q44031491-9F3F18C3-A10D-4264-82D8-B0F63DE7A611Q45983397-6A7E19D4-ABD6-4A7E-A8FD-A50687CD6B30Q47820741-41276CF8-2495-4E8D-BC46-285F6C50CA0CQ50431307-C0B0ADD4-DD58-4FC2-9F3E-1981B1EDD522Q50803727-DDAD0035-0228-4C1F-B432-0176E728FE88Q50995260-1AFDFB13-F467-45C6-AC1D-EB453C2C2073Q53123721-89768956-B720-45D2-980B-B6436D35A2E1Q55091704-E2531C73-A777-41B2-BE51-AC7D4E59A714Q57189544-B86C742B-D31C-4163-9A96-0EC87A8DC06D
P2860
Priority setting for health technology assessments: a systematic review of current practical approaches.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Priority setting for health te ...... current practical approaches.
@en
type
label
Priority setting for health te ...... current practical approaches.
@en
prefLabel
Priority setting for health te ...... current practical approaches.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Priority setting for health te ...... current practical approaches.
@en
P2093
Becky Skidmore
Donald R Husereau
Hussein Z Noorani
Rhonda Boudreau
P2860
P304
P356
10.1017/S026646230707050X
P577
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z