about
Why the fair innings argument is not persuasiveAgeism in cardiology.Rationing scarce life-sustaining resources on the basis of age.Elderly people and the public health service: a much desirable marriage.Preventive medicine in the older patient: a United kingdom perspective.Oral drug therapy in elderly with dysphagia: between a rock and a hard place!Flaws in agist arguments. Philosopher acquiesces to prevailing social mores.Flaws in agist arguments. Doctors need pragmatic strategies.Fundholding practice's draft policy on ethical use of resources. Policy is inconsistent.De facto health-care rationing by age. The law has no remedy.
P2860
Q24798876-34A6246C-E8FF-47DD-84D7-0D644473E3E5Q33776547-ECE87A9E-78FA-42D7-8AC1-55B689C939B2Q34351209-5A2B8BDA-B20D-4BF1-9732-EAD2502E3323Q35412465-25EC76BF-7E8C-49EA-83B7-FBBB6E45376CQ36075322-972CC5AA-1100-4130-B789-4B414F5151A8Q37626330-87647A05-B55C-4DBF-8CF6-033A2EAB28DEQ42879842-624E8F67-0BEB-4737-8AC1-CCF41720D435Q42880440-39217D66-4841-4535-AFBD-F1E56D148998Q43198123-B6D0117C-8087-4946-86F5-5B0493B216B4Q53567599-FAD64C08-91C4-404D-8EDD-393E63E612E8
P2860
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年論文
@yue
1995年論文
@zh-hant
1995年論文
@zh-hk
1995年論文
@zh-mo
1995年論文
@zh-tw
1995年论文
@wuu
1995年论文
@zh
1995年论文
@zh-cn
name
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.
@en
type
label
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.
@en
prefLabel
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.
@en
P1433
P1476
Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.
@en
P2093
M M Rivlin
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.310.6988.1179
P407
P577
1995-05-01T00:00:00Z