The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors
about
Trends in the production of scientific data analysis resources.Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis.Deconstructing doctoral dissertations: how many papers does it take to make a PhD?"Equal" contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship.The role of gender in scholarly authorshipDo age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective.Ethical considerations in scientific writing.Do Nobel Laureates Create Prize-Winning Networks? An Analysis of Collaborative Research in Physiology or MedicineMultinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative researchA simple, generalizable method for measuring individual research productivity and its use in the long-term analysis of departmental performance, including between-country comparisons.Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles.A systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials in head and neck oncology surgery.Productivity of authors in the field of diabetes: bibliographic analysis of trial publicationsThinker, Soldier, Scribe: cross-sectional study of researchers' roles and author order in the Annals of Internal Medicine.Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period.Bioinformatics programs are 31-fold over-represented among the highest impact scientific papers of the past two decades.How do research faculty in the biosciences evaluate paper authorship criteria?Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably - not equally, geometrically or arithmetically.Imagining the "open" university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education.Comments: Formal Research Training for Residents and Scholarly Output: It's Now or Never.Scientific research of senior Italian academics of occupational medicine: a citation analysis of products published during the decade 2001-2010.Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology.Normalized Paper Credit Assignment: A Solution for the Ethical Dilemma Induced by Multiple Important Authors.The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journalCoauthorship networks: A directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthorsA network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocationMicro‐credits in scientific publishingThe many hands of scienceACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN LIFE SCIENCES: THE CASE OF A MODERATE INNOVATOR COUNTRY
P2860
Q30864733-AB967090-9BAD-4FD8-9E59-DA4202669770Q33395675-85A20A70-1BDC-4B88-AD3C-653CAEB6F954Q34143426-EB8ABF0A-2B3A-4F7E-8864-061803CC6804Q34192054-86DA0A44-5316-4F77-BC7A-69634BF20CF7Q34872304-9A7074AE-1E18-4192-9F71-DE07303B031EQ35036146-E73FCEE2-E201-4A7A-B151-82A9D67F4378Q35365970-552E2097-CBB0-4C57-9A3A-FBD8153364F2Q35730678-43CFA54E-FE00-4554-B5F9-1634E36F08EFQ36276926-ED9613D9-8524-4868-965A-282E190D6DD6Q36575803-D9FAD9DF-B8D9-40F9-921A-4A0A8E65BDE5Q38118179-8193345F-15C8-434E-8CE9-3BE1F1AA29C6Q38204325-F0353093-44AF-41B5-A97F-1A6117D6820FQ38542019-5AA4A196-3853-462E-8EF3-7E7DE55A8A6DQ38710332-41E046DD-0745-4545-A9AE-8F0471B25648Q38946135-CF5FA77C-A5AB-4332-B77C-579BE404D3C8Q39788189-FE2063E2-9001-452F-AEF7-173D78DB616FQ41491976-CF95E4D5-26EE-403E-9C36-1BA10DCB652BQ41991469-A77223A4-8561-472C-AF06-550409833495Q42183997-7E73CFB0-35CA-4208-B75C-954E419E9A17Q42585268-D846DD68-1490-4450-8CAE-428E378292F3Q45915177-CE10BC97-E4A4-49D3-A962-2E98A0418905Q47104981-7FD35BF9-EB79-4E47-B4B8-DD4BF00F7A35Q47295207-B675A1FB-30FB-4275-A45A-1B252054068CQ53280619-0AB0D0B7-707D-4A8B-AECF-3A7DA98AC4DBQ58042240-C118D9EF-F91B-4953-9B2A-ED59CD2E0FEAQ58618816-B19C24E0-D218-49C7-A90C-B897EB22EEBCQ58618835-A4707E3A-2115-4A03-B01A-C1AA0EE4CC45Q58629322-0040B807-B2F2-4106-97DE-BECE68679E8EQ58900006-E0761A03-2185-4158-813A-A8FDF4174E9CQ59219685-93272001-F2AC-4535-B989-4DEF85B1D1B0
P2860
The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
The write position. A survey o ...... position and number of authors
@en
type
label
The write position. A survey o ...... position and number of authors
@en
prefLabel
The write position. A survey o ...... position and number of authors
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
The write position. A survey o ...... position and number of authors
@en
P2093
Katarzyna Z Kozak
Kathryn R Johnson
Lisa M Schilling
Sara J Deakyne
P2860
P304
P356
10.1038/SJ.EMBOR.7401095
P577
2007-11-01T00:00:00Z