How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards.
about
A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicalsO'Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions.Authors' response to comments from Nachman KE et al.Association between Exposure to p,p'-DDT and Its Metabolite p,p'-DDE with Obesity: Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reproducibility and Research Integrity.Exposure to Environmental and Occupational Particulate Air Pollution as a Potential Contributor to Neurodegeneration and Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Research
P2860
How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
2016年论文
@zh
2016年论文
@zh-cn
name
How credible are the study res ...... environmental health hazards.
@en
type
label
How credible are the study res ...... environmental health hazards.
@en
prefLabel
How credible are the study res ...... environmental health hazards.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
How credible are the study res ...... environmental health hazards.
@en
P2093
Andrew A Rooney
Andrew D Kraft
Glinda S Cooper
Gloria D Jahnke
Holger J Schünemann
Jennifer M Ratcliffe
Juleen Lam
Kristina A Thayer
Pamela Schwingl
Rebecca L Morgan
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ENVINT.2016.01.005
P577
2016-02-05T00:00:00Z