Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
about
Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Use, Outcomes, Imaging, and Diagnostic Tools.Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry - Victoria.Validation of the 2015 prostate cancer grade groups for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in a shared equal-access health system.Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.Newly Proposed Prognostic Grade Group System for Prostate Cancer: Genesis, Utility and its Implications in Clinical Practice.Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.Population-Based Validation of the 2014 ISUP Gleason Grade Groups in Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation, or no Local Treatment.The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groupsc-Met, CREB1 and EGFR are involved in miR-493-5p inhibition of EMT via AKT/GSK-3β/Snail signaling in prostate cancer.Dose painting of prostate cancer based on Gleason score correlations with apparent diffusion coefficients.Prostate cancer - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: update of a prospective single-center cohort.Global Gleason grade groups in prostate cancer: concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades and predictors of upgrade and downgrade.Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system.Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.Reply to 'Comment on "Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome"'.Comment on 'Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome'.The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer.Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for prostate cancer (summary: Japanese Urological Association, 2016 edition).Head-to-head comparison of prostate cancer risk calculators predicting biopsy outcome.
P2860
Q37029385-548D21A4-CCA0-4F9B-8E79-8845F486A7D8Q37496914-0887BC70-3C71-4D35-8FD1-B6E58ED1E097Q38702259-613CD3C4-D463-4AF8-B1E2-44090B2AA4B4Q38786316-B90E2613-5AA0-41A1-B736-1516D7AB8508Q38962125-5BF1FE64-3144-4CB7-9223-9110FC8BD5F1Q39029690-6894F007-C3E7-44E1-811B-9855B6AD79D5Q39368958-0C83FEFE-08AB-425D-A7B5-638149DF27C9Q39501766-A214E41B-4C45-4B0D-BDCF-17B5B3D1E87DQ40352192-101EBA2B-5E42-4DF2-8695-1199BCF2B160Q40535652-33CFA75C-3216-497B-808F-D45FBCA61603Q42369849-F3F26436-116C-40C4-8256-42EFFAEBC643Q47097668-DAB03F7A-1D7B-4826-AB5D-D64679672281Q47278049-3DC0F2B3-61B5-45C8-BBF1-9C3F2907E42DQ48212490-DF1ACB4B-FC99-4144-9B36-2451A71A23EBQ48275350-8DB4D171-4678-4E88-91B1-545BEF7D1343Q48334271-BD487D09-E370-49B6-B2F3-74250FF132E9Q48525011-66B32FDA-C0D8-4EE9-8BE6-2348B4196999Q48754441-0EFB775D-63E1-4C01-BBEA-688E052FB677Q48812964-276CA67C-F652-46D6-B64C-BBC905978187Q50297516-82A7BEE9-665F-4AB4-ABB3-170AC00F47E9Q50348561-8BF225A4-D0C0-4A0B-9859-F2E5F75ED372Q52679869-E302F8E0-DCF5-4847-B31C-A7C92C5A0FBDQ53734447-4B0D1766-E900-4C3B-874A-126930B51625Q54996710-8646A503-A1EF-45E7-8387-84F2B60B3CFF
P2860
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 17 December 2015
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@en
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@nl
type
label
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@en
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@nl
prefLabel
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@en
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
@en
P2093
David Robinson
Ingela Franck Lissbrant
Lars Egevad
Pär Stattin
Yasin Folkvaljon
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.11.036
P407
P50
P577
2015-12-17T00:00:00Z