LARS Artificial Ligament Versus ABC Purely Polyester Ligament for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
about
Comparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.The potential of using semitendinosus tendon as autograft in rabbit meniscus reconstruction.Differentiation of Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast Cells by In Vitro CocultureLong-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Either Synthetics With Remnant Preservation or Hamstring Autografts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study.A Long Shot.Innovative, intra-articular, prosthetic technique for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in dogs: a cadaveric study.
P2860
LARS Artificial Ligament Versus ABC Purely Polyester Ligament for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 15 June 2016
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@en
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@nl
type
label
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@en
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@nl
prefLabel
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@en
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
LARS Artificial Ligament Versu ...... ciate Ligament Reconstruction.
@en
P2093
Dimitrios N Bourlos
Dimitrios Ph Iliadis
Dimitrios S Mastrokalos
Efstathios Chronopoulos
George C Babis
P2860
P304
2325967116653359
P356
10.1177/2325967116653359
P577
2016-06-15T00:00:00Z