Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions
about
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation: How Can We Outperform the Provisional Strategy?Comparison between one-stent versus two-stent technique for treatment of left main bifurcation lesions: A large single-center data.Effect of final kissing balloon dilatation after one-stent technique at left-main bifurcation: a single center dataAre surgical trials with negative results being interpreted correctly?Xience side branch access stent for treatment of bifurcation coronary disease: a review of preclinical data.Evaluation of local flow conditions in jailed side branch lesions using computational fluid dynamics.Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: stent-covering of the side branch with and without PCI of the side branch: a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients.Comparing two-stent strategies for bifurcation coronary lesions: which vessel should be stented first, the main vessel or the side branch?Comparison of Angiographic Outcomes of Side Branch Ostium at Bifurcation Coronary Lesion between Two-stent and One-stent Techniques.Predictors and Periprocedural Myocardial Injury Rate of Small Side Branches Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Intervention.Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus PClinical applications of fractional flow reserve in bifurcation lesions.Six-month clinical outcomes of the Tryton Side Branch Stent for the treatment of bifurcation lesions.Acute and long-term angiographic outcomes of side branch stenosis after randomized treatment of zotarolimus-, sirolimus-, and paclitaxel-eluting stent for coronary artery stenosis.Clinical and angiographic predictors of major side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesionsUnbalanced Oxidant-Antioxidant Status: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion in Very Old Patients.Benefits of and safety concerns associated with drug-eluting coronary stents.Coronary bifurcation lesions: innovative approaches and the future of bifurcation devices.Long-term risk of clinical events from stenting side branches of coronary bifurcation lesions with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: an observational meta-analysis.Coronary artery bifurcation interventions: the disconnect between randomized clinical trials and patient centered decision-making.Bifurcation lesion morphology and intravascular ultrasound assessment.New strategies in the treatment of coronary bifurcations.2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and InterventiA new stenting technique for bifurcation lesions a nine-patient case series.The Tryton Side Branch Stent™ for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.Stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: a literature and technical review.Percutaneous treatment of left main and non-left main bifurcation coronary lesions using drug-eluting stents.Safety and efficacy of the Tryton Side Branch Stent™ for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: an update.Recent perspective on coronary artery bifurcation interventionsClinical outcomes following bifurcation double-stenting with bioresorbable scaffolds.Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with simple or complex stenting: 5-year survival from patient-level pooled analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study.Outcomes of a dedicated stent in coronary bifurcations with large side branches: A subanalysis of the randomized TRYTON bifurcation study.Clinical outcome after percutaneous treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions using first or second generation of drug-eluting stents.Impact of side-branch flow in coronary bifurcation intervention.Efficacy of one- vs. two-stent implantation for coronary bifurcation lesions in diabetic patients utilizing AIR2 as an endpoint.A novel technique in the use of fractional flow reserve in coronary artery bifurcation lesions.Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation.Bifurcation stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis from dkcrush II randomized study.Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two-stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents.Placement of Tryton Side Branch Stent only; a new treatment strategy for Medina 0,0,1 coronary bifurcation lesions.
P2860
Q26739016-B3F49A67-4863-40D3-97C5-E315F3DA01A1Q30885668-07C2F8DB-ABC1-41BE-B62F-245372D9D38CQ30908289-0883F9AF-C5FB-4DA7-8EA6-EF01ADA7B412Q34193301-773D3FEA-53EE-4013-835C-6E8E1A8AEDD5Q34314763-A4414E25-A9F9-4DBC-8177-1C1D5113BE9FQ34648783-A43DCA05-4FC4-450F-821B-3A2B82C21399Q34655495-A93CC3B8-7B42-4B51-8457-26504643E51BQ35158769-A1CE4F2F-F900-4220-B77A-E561BF3BDD4DQ35778574-F5668C43-C3E8-48D6-AB56-65B92AE7C23BQ35858267-1B84731B-7966-42FF-B9BC-0CC0DB29A8A1Q36260448-0F9B4DA0-25E4-46E6-B7CE-106E3A60C91CQ36313665-C223ED94-E35A-4C81-9886-8DDDEE36A05FQ36377265-82E140CA-77BA-4135-8889-21C1AD167877Q36472962-D0171BEF-9CB8-4ECA-AD8A-D0B3D1EF7727Q36523295-55505AF2-EF4D-4402-AF32-D69C14810F6AQ37504067-995D7975-C711-41CB-85B5-B30372C51B22Q37707419-67DA9388-C0B5-47BB-BB2C-E48079035EBFQ37709409-C5491DD5-C15E-48D8-855F-4515A7FEF22FQ37786302-EB9DD05D-2310-4015-9443-868353DEDA7AQ37847111-B074DBEC-A968-4182-9AE9-F8FE16789AC0Q37853468-20E0FD45-F729-4F47-9B43-7BF3C2150E71Q37871912-0FF5A35E-49E7-4F0F-A67C-420B3A0A86CFQ37953885-F82F14DD-16DE-48A5-93EC-71AD631689FBQ38081138-F4BC3831-6216-4E46-B708-6FF5BE4E1974Q38155939-83D48771-05FE-434F-BE3A-FA5EE12AB851Q38451897-A21C5D17-A11F-4D30-A951-A007CC8584CFQ38632232-5E9736D5-246D-4546-BC6F-9D55479ADEA5Q38743971-F2DD174A-46E7-452C-AD24-387FD84EAA9DQ38871738-64476A61-BB56-447D-B2CD-31CB13137823Q39762280-8EF1C11A-400B-4DC6-97CF-DDC58C10E190Q39781076-23F3947B-BD0A-41E1-8CF0-850DC1A79D3FQ41330750-8F2EC5AC-A470-411E-9412-DCD46C9ADEB1Q41433121-3CBA4D4D-A5B1-4C27-B3B4-8DF4068F929DQ41870615-D34AEBD4-35A2-4002-90C8-7A5BDE3B65C6Q42023150-E9B58D83-3118-4D2E-AFFC-75BE6AB306F7Q42325711-1549FCB2-02D0-43D6-AD02-75DBF4053CD1Q43052276-514039FF-5B49-4E4C-9072-F653B168E2E6Q44513912-54CC0F63-3793-4E15-BC09-E194A5AA6755Q45731822-C6936DAC-C5EF-4807-B8B2-D14CDC2ADF63Q46081838-8EE6AC4E-5E0D-489E-9F50-1E2FE6F67DCC
P2860
Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 09 October 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... o coronary bifurcation lesions
@en
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... coronary bifurcation lesions.
@nl
type
label
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... o coronary bifurcation lesions
@en
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... coronary bifurcation lesions.
@nl
prefLabel
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... o coronary bifurcation lesions
@en
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... coronary bifurcation lesions.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Randomized trial on routine vs ...... o coronary bifurcation lesions
@en
P2093
Franz-Josef Neumann
Hans-Peter Bestehorn
Heinz Joachim Büttner
Klaus-Dieter Werner
Michael Gick
Miroslaw Ferenc
Piotr Kuebler
Rolf-Peter Kienzle
Thomas Comberg
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHN455
P577
2008-10-09T00:00:00Z