about
Challenges and strategies in the repair of ruptured annulus fibrosusAccuracy of MR elastography and anatomic MR imaging features in the diagnosis of severe hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.An online evidence-based decision support system for distinguishing benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures by magnetic resonance imaging feature analysis.Association of abdominal obesity with lumbar disc degeneration--a magnetic resonance imaging study.Body mass index is associated with lumbar disc degeneration in young Finnish males: subsample of Northern Finland birth cohort study 1986.Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgeryInexperienced clinicians can extract pathoanatomic information from MRI narrative reports with high reproducibility for use in research/quality assurance.Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.Inter-rater reliability between musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic surgeons on computed tomography imaging features of spinal metastases.Retention in physically demanding jobs of individuals with low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Are Modic changes prognostic for recovery in a cohort of patients with non-specific low back pain?An International Multicenter Study Assessing the Role of Ethnicity on Variation of Lumbar Facet Joint Orientation and the Occurrence of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis in Asia Pacific: A Study from the AOSpine Asia Pacific Research Collaboration ConsConsensus versus disagreement in imaging research: a case study using the LIDC database.Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting lumbo-sacral nerve root compromise: a systematic literature review.Is hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT) a useful adjunct in the management of suspected facet joints arthropathy?Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.Clinical and radiological findings of discogenic low back pain confirmed by automated pressure-controlled discography.Computer-assisted diagnosis in renal nuclear medicine: rationale, methodology, and interpretative criteria for diuretic renography.Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.Challenges and opportunities for imaging journals: emerging from the shadows.Do MRI findings identify patients with low back pain or sciatica who respond better to particular interventions? A systematic review.Mechanical Low Back Pain in Elite Track and Field Athletes: An observational cohort study.The prevalence of degenerative or incidental findings in the lumbar spine of pediatric patients: a study using magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool.The Copenhagen Standardised MRI protocol to assess the pubic symphysis and adductor regions of athletes: outline and intratester and intertester reliability.Using Magnetic Resonance Myelography to Improve Interobserver Agreement in the Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis and Root CompressionValue of Bone Scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in Lumbar Facet Disease and Prediction of Short-term Outcome of Ultrasound Guided Medial Branch Block with Bone SPECT.Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.Vertebral endplate changes are not associated with chronic low back pain among Southern European subjects: a case control study.Influence of nomenclature in the interpretation of lumbar disk contour on MR imaging: a comparison of the agreement using the combined task force and the nordic nomenclatures.Disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: an association which becomes nonsignificant when endplate changes and disc contour are taken into account.Augmented reality visualisation using an image overlay system for MR-guided interventions: technical performance of spine injection procedures in human cadavers at 1.5 Tesla.The association between Modic changes and pain during 1-year follow-up in patients with lumbar radicular pain.Degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters.Reliability of standing weight-bearing (0.25T) MR imaging findings and positional changes in the lumbar spine.Surgeon Reliability for the Assessment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on MRI: The Impact of Surgeon Experience.Prospective Comparison of Changes in Lumbar Spine MRI Findings over Time between Individuals with Acute Low Back Pain and Controls: An Exploratory Study.A statistical model for intervertebral disc degeneration: determination of the optimal T2 cut-off values.Reliability of change in lumbar MRI findings over time in patients with and without disc prosthesis--comparing two different image evaluation methods.Feasibility of MR elastography of the intervertebral disc.
P2860
Q26829807-5F71A6FA-2698-448C-8217-C6807CE3D9C4Q30454078-1142BA13-BC98-4AC9-96EC-F5DF10078F53Q33647879-49CA99F7-46F4-4EF7-ACF0-81CD8144C202Q34589933-572A9803-5F0A-4C80-9CFE-9767BC996505Q34623177-4373FB50-0250-44A6-8641-B34547EBD7B1Q34848429-591F2F6D-42AC-4DC1-A475-9F11E63B0D5CQ35160622-C2C50BC7-9AB9-4B6E-B3D7-5438550D955BQ35220513-4BABA39D-3303-40EF-9141-74660420A82AQ35573014-41A9917B-156F-4A8F-B458-1245E1002E2FQ35579111-F967E731-2D55-4EEA-8705-1B370705A60AQ35812714-BD95F9DE-99D9-42A7-AAC6-FBDED3E09CF4Q35911676-8AD70053-BABA-4871-859C-B35072344684Q35948930-ADE0FF3A-1D19-4B50-B6B5-50C32F93CB2CQ36055856-BB75D081-0359-4C6A-8E86-7FD85D55B145Q36124656-965CE2EB-B545-46EB-859B-AE421FB0E3A7Q36781421-95FC2457-A8EA-4C4B-8F5C-D8EECD903447Q36930503-C6FFBC3C-1540-4707-9B5E-829A9364DF2CQ37412080-9256020C-DCDD-4F6F-BEBA-3E323F997182Q37716249-CFA3836E-E86D-4DCB-AEDF-D8B228705D5EQ37918965-36493C51-CB3E-472A-9F48-B7185B844954Q37918973-EBE8AED1-B596-4EF0-A844-26F280DED897Q38578506-05DF69DF-80ED-43F1-8326-5524322B1BE8Q40143651-441B6711-648F-413A-8FF5-A237FA28A716Q41603979-70C69F55-981F-48F4-AAB2-1255CA6690BBQ41713225-03F48017-24A9-4696-BB83-354B9ABACA1FQ42145635-9D13E5DB-D456-47EE-80E8-1F6B1751772CQ42751303-16EA7158-260E-4F3A-80E9-C72674C5DA51Q44075932-8A6CC5A0-A3F5-4060-8ACB-EBC1378A5063Q44564393-C9DCBFF2-DC76-4E06-B51C-642A579C539AQ44674578-E8B73A6E-85B3-4644-990D-FF922C09411EQ45001272-19A174F1-4459-4601-8B49-0669ECE6CD0EQ45361744-F33FF665-F783-4F70-8F60-60D7BDDC675AQ45926524-02C3655A-C4D0-409E-B61C-2CC8BC53E9CFQ46281601-6CE1E0AC-8BC5-4A22-A6A0-5F8769FD2F95Q47193900-084A315D-B2B4-423E-9017-12B79E6105BBQ47645494-824FD2A1-495B-4870-8970-38F7AA1D377DQ48294985-9D61BAC6-85B5-47FF-9B4D-5D4908119B39Q51142372-C0FF4BB5-999A-440B-9139-41E214F042DFQ51399014-268B76EB-30C3-4912-9C79-338C94A2C12CQ51571132-5495A763-1A35-4DCE-9E11-9F2C0189E132
P2860
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 27 October 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings
@en
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings.
@nl
type
label
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings
@en
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings.
@nl
prefLabel
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings
@en
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings
@en
P2093
Anna N A Tosteson
Emily Blood
Eugene J Carragee
James N Weinstein
Jay Kaiser
John A Carrino
Jon D Lurie
Loretta H Pearson
Margaret R Grove
Richard Herzog
P2860
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2493071999
P407
P577
2008-10-27T00:00:00Z