Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning
about
Particle therapy for non-small cell lung tumors: where do we stand? A systematic review of the literatureIncluding robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapyVisualization of a variety of possible dosimetric outcomes in radiation therapy using dose-volume histogram bandsUncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implantsDosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.Assessing the robustness of passive scattering proton therapy with regard to local recurrence in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of a phase II trial.Whole breast proton irradiation for maximal reduction of heart dose in breast cancer patients.Interfractional variations in the setup of pelvic bony anatomy and soft tissue, and their implications on the delivery of proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.New developments in treatment planning and verification of particle beam therapy.Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers.Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapyRobustness of target dose coverage to motion uncertainties for scanned carbon ion beam tracking therapy of moving tumorsRobust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Increases Estimated Clinical Benefit in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniquesFast range-corrected proton dose approximation method using prior dose distribution.Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibrationThe physical basis and future of radiation therapy.PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.Application of failure mode and effects analysis to treatment planning in scanned proton beam radiotherapy.Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.Worst case optimization for interfractional motion mitigation in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer.Challenges and opportunities in patient-specific, motion-managed and PET/CT-guided radiation therapy of lung cancer: review and perspective.Functional lung avoidance and response-adaptive escalation (FLARE) RT: Multimodality plan dosimetry of a precision radiation oncology strategy.Intensity modulated proton therapyRegistration of pencil beam proton radiography data with X-ray CT.Development of the open-source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad.Special report: Workshop on 4D-treatment planning in actively scanned particle therapy-Recommendations, technical challenges, and future research directions.Initial development of goCMC: a GPU-oriented fast cross-platform Monte Carlo engine for carbon ion therapy.A novel dose-based positioning method for CT image-guided proton therapy.Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.A method for evaluation of proton plan robustness towards inter-fractional motion applied to pelvic lymph node irradiation.The energy margin strategy for reducing dose variation due to setup uncertainty in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) delivered with distal edge tracking (DET)Improved beam angle arrangement in intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning for localized prostate cancerA comparison of the dose distributions from three proton treatment planning systems in the planning of meningioma patients with single-field uniform dose pencil beam scanning.An in-silico comparison of proton beam and IMRT for postoperative radiotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.Dosimetric robustness against setup errors in charged particle radiotherapy of skull base tumors.
P2860
Q27023426-3CC90E02-4994-45F0-8502-0D82149DCB4FQ33274341-65E06865-694F-426A-86D0-BC6D7CA193E9Q33274509-27491830-D802-4AF8-B641-ED0244F04C69Q33274545-670A1504-FF9E-45BE-BC27-48282CCB7872Q33274841-B609D76D-FEE2-42DF-9B29-6C7D707AA62AQ33275432-8BFA07D3-0D34-41AF-895C-F4FEF85DD057Q33645532-76D8C095-4FFB-44E1-87E0-987E9520CB51Q34334274-60D0C60E-3509-4BA7-A814-186F1FFD62F2Q34520588-2CA2A760-C2EC-449F-B4AD-927B11FD74C4Q34700374-677310E9-17D7-46B6-910A-DA27CDB5475AQ35163969-4937545D-FA94-49CC-BD66-37AEC3CBC8DFQ35212130-E6447F6A-71E5-4BC7-95DB-0494EE9951A7Q35257927-93937B41-C7F7-4B8B-8A67-8B41DFF7D065Q35764013-3F9CD863-CACB-46CE-AFFB-6F21DCCA5D0EQ35974874-18E1AA16-BC44-492F-A877-023F96B9BC50Q35989268-BE385526-A819-47EA-9067-26829B156C72Q36073300-82CE0357-EA49-47E9-BC04-42D96CC62366Q36094562-E2BD9979-F779-48C4-BA2E-C497BA605799Q36324594-3AD08BBB-EDBF-4084-95EC-032E996444D5Q36581612-21037F2A-C52F-4168-950A-28F8288E7C62Q36805626-F681A4C1-CA90-4B42-9602-CC29E02EBD25Q36834990-3A04A26B-5FB6-4DAB-9BB3-B322AE1274B2Q36921717-F66BC068-4702-4E98-8D91-902929CC0E26Q37066711-7D2E2855-D993-4ADE-A2CE-CEC5210B00F5Q37322138-6BB1C4EA-D6C0-433C-BA73-F1F1A205A421Q38078108-53FEBA85-CA76-4A2D-956F-ECC094F70D37Q38401313-053851E2-5B73-402D-B638-D0F1FD6A84F4Q38414155-3A9C3255-4D5F-490C-BD75-3712C9379D13Q38644197-01168482-2D59-4FDD-A619-C14747628DCBQ38736022-828ECBF3-9767-4BC8-9288-8006ED0635F8Q38775109-6750BD2A-6017-4E80-A2EA-01CC91B6242EQ38989872-BE52164B-6767-4694-962A-9A58606DC3ABQ40624910-E9EDA25C-04BC-46F0-9B7E-B2BA60F3FA90Q40625237-E19DEF1F-9C28-498E-8294-749C12E3A938Q40704389-1CE4079F-1F9F-40B6-A722-05BFB9EED247Q40922827-2E7D8E72-2F60-4249-9839-D898AA5E25C4Q41416202-538BA5B1-6A7B-40C0-8813-1CD17809948DQ41440121-AD90E82F-406A-47A6-A1EA-B36C57961044Q41501172-7F3851E4-5590-42E2-83B3-2617DFC0F90CQ41725390-71534512-A32E-4AC1-BD00-5F412D4E43C8
P2860
Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on January 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... obabilistic treatment planning
@en
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... babilistic treatment planning.
@nl
type
label
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... obabilistic treatment planning
@en
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... babilistic treatment planning.
@nl
prefLabel
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... obabilistic treatment planning
@en
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... babilistic treatment planning.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Reducing the sensitivity of IM ...... obabilistic treatment planning
@en
P2093
Benjamin C Martin
Martin Soukup
Thomas Bortfeld
P2860
P304
P356
10.1118/1.3021139
P407
P577
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z