The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
about
Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in womenPelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in womenMinimum important difference for validated instruments in women with urge incontinence.Correlates and predictors of patient satisfaction with drug therapy and combined drug therapy and behavioral training for urgency urinary incontinence in women.The minimum important difference for the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form in women with stress urinary incontinence.Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.Effects of colpocleisis on bowel symptoms among women with severe pelvic organ prolapse.Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder.Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence.The effect of age on stress and urgency urinary incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary midurethral sling.Do Physical Therapy Interventions Affect Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis?: An Evidence-Based Review.Decrease in urinary incontinence management costs in women enrolled in a clinical trial of weight loss to treat urinary incontinence.Pelvic floor symptoms improve similarly after pessary and behavioral treatment for stress incontinence.Sexual activity and function in women more than 2 years after midurethral sling placement.Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary and repeat midurethral sling procedures.Quality of Life and Sexual Function 2 Years After Vaginal Surgery for Prolapse.Long-term patient satisfaction with michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension for prolapse.Concomitant Laparoscopic Burch Urethropexy and Combined Vaginal-Laparoscopic Mesh Sling Removal (x2) for Pain and Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence.Ethnicity and variations of pelvic organ prolapse bother.Patient-reported outcomes and different approaches to urinary parameters in overactive bladder: what should we measure?Behavioral therapy with or without biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation for persistent postprostatectomy incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.Endpoints for therapeutic interventions in faecal incontinence: small step or game changer.Does a history of bullying and abuse predict lower urinary tract symptoms, chronic pain, and sexual dysfunction?Methods for a multicenter randomized trial for mixed urinary incontinence: rationale and patient-centeredness of the ESTEEM trial.Validating endpoints for therapeutic trials in fecal incontinenceDetermining the minimum clinically important differences for outcomes in the DOMINO trial.The effect of uterine fibroid embolization on lower urinary tract symptoms.Characteristics of patients seeking outpatient rehabilitation for pelvic-floor dysfunction.Effects of PFM rehabilitation on PFM function and morphology in older women.Most older women recover baseline functional status following pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire in women undergoing treatment for pelvic floor disorders.Perioperative Behavioral Therapy and Pelvic Muscle Strengthening Do Not Enhance Quality of Life After Pelvic Surgery: Secondary Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Changes in urethral sphincter size following rehabilitation in older women with stress urinary incontinence.Long-term micturition problems of asymptomatic postpartum urinary retention: a prospective case-control study.Predictive modeling and threshold scores for care seeking among women with urinary incontinence: The short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Urogenital Distress Inventory.Enhanced interpretability of the PFDI-20 with establishment of reference scores among women in the general population.Quality of life after treatment with midurethral sling and concomitant prolapse repair in patients with mixed versus stress urinary incontinence.Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.Subjective outcome of 166 tension-free vaginal tape procedures performed by a single surgeon: the Braemar experience.
P2860
Q24187989-59763E69-C269-401D-8392-0143C657F812Q24202394-5DF8EF7E-E608-429F-B28B-1605B23CB6CFQ30353491-62E7D261-A167-4503-BE35-3B7BD8F60777Q30428088-5DEDC6B7-A67A-424A-A4AD-D58AE68223C5Q33655386-DB9EA0D6-F7AB-4D8A-87B3-A2CDB40B889DQ33851692-F5B6428A-1F96-4DFC-B00C-F199AC9F3513Q33957327-835A8F22-6E4E-4683-B4B1-52DBCBE4C050Q34030420-70CEAA90-71D3-4609-A736-ABD7EE903A3DQ34037750-65AA466C-FF96-4823-8628-4A253CBA3B43Q35537111-85D04FAB-B839-4BDB-BBE7-EDF4595946A9Q35637801-0A316CF4-DF6E-4A2B-AEE0-F603C3259105Q35974833-5499B9BD-9CF6-4EAF-BC68-1F9607FD8120Q36114259-97190B84-0356-4AC8-A63C-38805BC612F6Q36177500-F06130FB-4059-4813-9B32-2142FC2714DDQ36581784-69162342-E316-447F-B24C-D68B08913EF4Q36889167-6F732976-4267-460D-B8ED-FBC720A0A312Q36932617-EFB06655-5E8E-4A07-8AE7-494E0BB8F1BEQ37385668-CE1B1A84-FDF0-4B23-B7E6-8AD658578AB3Q37411673-1FC38D18-10FA-40FE-88E4-85A71F518287Q37579731-86EF4F63-7BBA-46D3-B209-30C0CBA1CF3EQ37947438-5D627057-3A97-4008-ADDD-7731C07F17DCQ38495910-88B47479-BE8C-41AB-8C3A-22EE0032E340Q38903812-02D7ADF3-D865-4ED3-AA1A-B9777F93E27BQ38919834-5ADE4E1F-1B1D-4B02-820A-D3A301EDF586Q41644524-F6B37FC9-F7DE-4F09-BE6E-694D339B3DCBQ42408757-1B870710-3AD7-4D64-B665-1DEE30D688EDQ42675662-846A7EB9-2BEA-4312-8822-181236B3F194Q43645222-0E33566E-C386-4008-96AD-AE9361CB7DF3Q44445602-B2E247A6-8720-4B98-86E7-880B365EAE65Q45129753-F9BF64DF-6436-4699-A984-2C8B9732E486Q45713848-D12D5046-CB11-47B3-9D02-90DA2A43C125Q45904877-9E04A0B9-68B0-4AA3-B421-2EE537E829E9Q46122589-57374452-3760-47DA-9286-265709983467Q47434393-A1E0EB00-1EF3-4308-8255-5CF2AAAD5CE6Q47717502-906E5A97-F8EE-4E79-97B8-D62032350489Q48003772-93660E7C-EB6C-4121-8FB9-5A8093A99B19Q48450725-D6252AB5-4A9F-4EDC-8999-8ED095C1A36DQ48662114-F647B072-96FD-4EB7-8485-73EA74DFDC18Q50047519-FF8AD996-4BE0-4F47-B54B-D9FAA37581DDQ51284787-1ECC9370-CDE2-48B1-8CB7-C73510B2E262
P2860
The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on May 2009
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@en
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@nl
type
label
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@en
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@nl
prefLabel
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@en
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
The minimum important differen ...... ic Floor Impact Questionnaire.
@en
P2093
Cathie Spino
Charles W Nager
Ingrid Nygaard
Linda Brubaker
Matthew D Barber
Nancy K Janz
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Thomas L Wheeler
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AJOG.2009.02.007
P407
P577
2009-05-01T00:00:00Z