Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.
about
Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendationsPopulation-based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United StatesWhat implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic reviewReducing inequities in colorectal cancer screening in North AmericaFollow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of careMeasuring and improving cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening rates in a multi-site urban practice in Toronto, Canada.Breast and cervical cancer screening specific effects of depression and obesity.Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammographyImproving cervical cancer screening rates in an urban HIV clinic.Characteristics of Effective Colorectal Cancer Screening Navigation Programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Review.Exploring cancer screening in the context of unmet mental health needs: a participatory pilot study.Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysisA pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence.The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.Promotion and provision of colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of colorectal cancer control program grantees and nongrantees, 2011-2012.Pilot test of a peer-led small-group video intervention to promote mammography screening among Chinese American immigrantsWomen's cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis.Breast cancer screening interventions in selected counties across US regionsIncreasing the use of preventative health services to promote healthy eating, physical activity and weight management: the acceptability and potential effectiveness of a proactive telemarketing approach.A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptakeContextual Analysis of Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Among Women in the United States, 2004Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour.Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: physician and general population perspectives, New Mexico, 2006.Selecting the optimal healthcare centers with a modified P-median model: a visual analytic perspective.Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Reactions to a targeted intervention to increase fecal occult blood testing among average-risk adults waiting for screening colonoscopyAssessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S.Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trialA systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States.Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic reviewOptimization of preventive health care facility locations.Regret on choice of colorectal cancer screening modality was associated with poorer screening compliance: a 4-year prospective cohort study.Cancer Screening Behaviors of African American Women Enrolled in a Community-Based Cancer Prevention Trial.Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice.Relationship between colorectal cancer screening adherence and knowledge among vulnerable rural residents of Appalachian Kentucky.A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.Integrating primary care and public health: learning from the Brazilian way.
P2860
Q24620823-4616139D-7570-4833-B0E2-0854BF45F7D5Q26786602-E5F0FCBC-AE2D-4CC8-8563-4032AAECB61CQ26828499-3DBB5181-CF98-4E9A-BD46-1D1B7EE2A6DBQ26859952-28831CCD-3E99-4471-AF49-072C03C6085AQ26861549-05F4AA0C-1DDA-4955-87CA-1B510AE4C8DFQ33622425-4CB9611A-5E16-40FF-87E9-C59ACE06CC47Q33715227-59AD05CF-06DD-4227-826A-E49A4B5F9000Q33782331-4B4C093C-3C7C-4ACC-94DA-9D4ACFF6F8FEQ33784743-B3140CC9-21B1-4946-B66B-39A10D739203Q33842533-F171175C-D2FC-49A1-BB0B-65C12873DFA4Q33921754-33CC663E-A6B9-4FBF-8AA7-28EC10EF6B5CQ34008967-62072164-A24F-418D-9C52-ED9FA01F8D26Q34085068-4F645794-872D-4FB7-B5E7-224D85C63603Q34129706-790993DF-AD07-4D06-B612-9CC4BB51BE91Q34273808-8F6C01F9-BE72-444D-9FAA-8D0C3B2DFEF6Q34284833-6BDA032D-985C-4FFF-82F2-62FAB20B6C90Q34345045-6E3BAC1D-44CE-4D34-8CFC-623925B6108FQ34361159-7C0DABBD-7477-4EC0-B6FA-58479A648DE3Q34440179-2F392C2C-49F1-4474-AADD-68E262D9FB36Q34470278-D45A6B2F-8F80-4F93-B886-9B5D17BC4BC5Q34506282-1164DA3A-239F-40F3-8F63-C10BBD01AD85Q34574981-B4B29C42-DBE2-44BC-9978-0DC456800B78Q34591771-DF86969F-A2A5-4AE6-9A1D-36D265BD72DDQ34634268-ECD4F831-8DEF-4F8F-9863-1C1445E6D491Q34776038-838F3E6B-36A3-4778-8503-10F0DCB4AC5AQ34951121-70544216-ABE2-46B5-BFD4-523D40F108AEQ34990939-58003EF4-778C-4B41-A9D8-4C460FB26385Q35045277-99A7ABE1-67A9-410B-BFA0-BD48A72EC04FQ35052755-96DB2A16-F4AC-4EB6-BD3B-C10E4195ABDCQ35105996-FBEEBF55-9B02-48B3-A7F8-61611A2880A2Q35128840-6EE48F67-3F44-4226-9947-C9B906F49D0AQ35156828-6EBA7D2B-1C55-4384-AEDF-178EDE5F7DE6Q35180218-13D37B13-D233-4AFD-9BFB-345E604D4B76Q35416823-B1508D8D-B9E9-403B-B618-05070D1B43A6Q35535478-31F8E954-C684-48D2-9248-52C90609178DQ35568745-3EB3FCA8-04E7-412E-8CE3-37979C0E8873Q35612889-A9BE9543-B0AF-41E2-A2FC-88FFCAE7013BQ35643340-08A8F5CB-9B13-4E60-AA72-DA21BA7F6BFBQ35694114-91F934A1-FF68-4CFC-ADB3-92495FF7DB80Q35703648-A576FEF1-71CB-4EB3-B071-B4908D5917EC
P2860
Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年学术文章
@wuu
2008年学术文章
@zh
2008年学术文章
@zh-cn
2008年学术文章
@zh-hans
2008年学术文章
@zh-my
2008年学术文章
@zh-sg
2008年學術文章
@yue
2008年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@en
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@en
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@en
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P50
P1476
Client-directed interventions ...... screening a systematic review.
@en
P2093
Barbara K Rimer
Geetika P Kalra
Katherine M Wilson
Nancy C Lee
Nancy Habarta
Patricia Dolan Mullen
Peter A Briss
Ralph J Coates
Rosalind A Breslow
Roy C Baron
P304
P356
10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2008.04.002
P433
P577
2008-07-01T00:00:00Z