What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
about
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAre treatments more effective than placebos? A systematic review and meta-analysisConsolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journalsCare home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older peopleTransparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkA meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventionsCONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsCONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsDeveloping and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceEffectiveness of interventions to reduce ordering of thyroid function tests: a systematic reviewFeatures of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-AnalysesActivities to support the implementation of complex interventions as part of routine care: a review of the quality of reporting in cluster randomised controlled trialsA Systematic Review Exploring the Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation as a Framework for Chronic Health Condition InterventionsThe Effectiveness of Conservative Management for Acute Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD) II: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled TrialsEffect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence: a systematic review revealing research gapsStatistical and methodological considerations for reporting RCTs in medical literatureUse of behavioral change techniques in web-based self-management programs for type 2 diabetes patients: systematic reviewBest use of experimental data in cancer informaticsDescribing methods and interventions: a protocol for the systematic analysis of the perioperative quality improvement literatureReporting behaviour change interventions: do the behaviour change technique taxonomy v1, and training in its use, improve the quality of intervention descriptions?The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationBridging Translation by Improving Preclinical Study Design in AKIThe evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of cochrane systematic reviewsThe Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical ResearchShoulder Arthroplasty Trials Are Infrequently Registered: A Systematic Review of TrialsPoor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trialsSPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trialsThe impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennialThe effectiveness of music in pediatric healthcare: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsParenting Programs for the Prevention of Child Physical Abuse Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisCellulite and extracorporeal Shockwave therapy (CelluShock-2009)--a randomized trialUsing the time and motion method to study clinical work processes and workflow: methodological inconsistencies and a call for standardized research.Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal instructions to authorsA systematic review of the quality of reporting in published smoking cessation trials for pregnant women: an explanation for the evidence-practice gap?A scoping review of classification schemes of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into practice in healthcareMethods used to address fidelity of receipt in health intervention research: a citation analysis and systematic reviewProcess evaluation of the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) trial: active and less active ingredients of a multi-component complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribingTime for a step change? Improving the efficiency, relevance, reliability, validity and transparency of aphasia rehabilitation research through core outcome measures, a common data set and improved reporting criteria.Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statementUsing education to improve control of asthma in children.
P2860
Q21092360-C7B20E24-F237-4F3F-BB04-99F70A6443DBQ21559660-9090E76B-C4D9-439C-8EB1-93050900B923Q24197568-834831CA-1BCB-40A2-8213-540D077E486BQ24241076-EE230EC7-C197-49D3-BF90-826F94054D4DQ24288938-25B5F0B3-8FF2-459B-A645-0DDD9C75A362Q24594196-65DAA7FB-D496-4961-8AFF-E34291029F54Q24614627-6B3AB971-1AEF-4187-800C-6C9C8BB10BEDQ24614759-F5730ADA-9102-4001-BBAE-8F35EE74D4F9Q24647443-0FAE4EAB-D5AF-426B-B2DC-758DD956E917Q24658517-767A6B7B-A807-4C9B-A718-ABE418112BDDQ26774311-A5E921F2-D91B-44CE-BB62-DA3035A87C40Q26785215-76090FEA-7D27-4EA8-8B4E-5D3CD38C6C83Q26801064-59B56DC1-4A97-41C3-AEFF-52C1D165F8BAQ26801421-69A47EDB-D3C1-4593-AD7E-944A0267DE9BQ26862555-45E4FB24-B9FE-475D-8F41-8A463B0A435FQ26864374-1B7E2243-05EE-4F7B-92A2-EB13D8462D5DQ27002472-E670D8D5-8321-445B-AC66-31E7C7F79AD3Q27010374-91C9B38E-ADB0-4A4A-92C1-33C0196E9CF1Q27024946-1871B058-21F4-4B77-90E4-B1F12418A5E3Q27301774-F3E16B2B-7908-48C7-9CB7-15485A3A0C83Q27860581-51159066-5E7C-4958-8DBA-4E3CBD1D778AQ28084530-9DE5998A-3CB4-43D5-880B-D0E1116D34FDQ28476394-307BA8B8-35DB-4296-9F8D-F392A831D8B6Q28548038-EA845145-2FAA-4890-A08B-8DEA57784805Q28552809-EA8DA862-5A43-4A9E-8858-6B31538AAAB0Q28681111-DFFC5DE0-8CC4-44A6-8CFA-0B3EB1C8441FQ28710019-ED9BD158-4395-415D-A6EC-45C9AFDACFA8Q30277230-A5BF2EC5-3036-4096-B896-7A809B548E0AQ30395278-5A2CDB7E-38FB-4DF7-9101-F05861755715Q30400742-CC2C3B20-379E-4D74-961B-6761DB4CA3D7Q30478620-DC2BA777-6A9F-44AF-9B02-3C0B4DCCE6C2Q30503990-EAA35495-5CB3-4C1D-A038-D7B1FCD49070Q30566026-4C70AFF9-4812-486F-8C61-C87206502911Q30586422-45080D23-0E56-4EA7-A294-8D69EA22B4D1Q30625451-F3DD46E2-A6A4-46E0-B003-CB0A65B04796Q30829163-2EE1456E-89B2-41CA-833E-1970E512CFDDQ30834177-5A2C61E5-9EC2-41A8-8CDA-6259166E3901Q30855760-6269BE1F-7DDB-4CFB-B434-E1C56C6ED4EFQ30984375-A0B646BF-6AB1-49CF-99B8-E333E88F81D5Q31084412-24F043C8-2D7F-4EE7-B629-B2C9AB0A5004
P2860
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on June 2008
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@en
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@nl
type
label
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@en
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@nl
prefLabel
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@en
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
@en
P2093
Emma Meats
Sasha Shepperd
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.39590.732037.47
P407
P577
2008-06-01T00:00:00Z