Representativeness of the participants in the smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): a cross-sectional study.

about

Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier Averag

P2860

Q33921676-B5896902-69FA-4CDD-B7A5-1CFB891385F2

P2860

Representativeness of the participants in the smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): a cross-sectional study.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37212076

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 26 August 2016

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Representativeness of the part ...... PIT): a cross-sectional study.

@en

Representativeness of the part ...... in Pregnancy Incentives Trial

@nl

type

Item

label

Representativeness of the part ...... PIT): a cross-sectional study.

@en

Representativeness of the part ...... in Pregnancy Incentives Trial

@nl

prefLabel

Representativeness of the part ...... PIT): a cross-sectional study.

@en

Representativeness of the part ...... in Pregnancy Incentives Trial

@nl

P1476

Representativeness of the part ...... CPIT): a cross-sectional study

@en

P2093

Daniel F Mackay

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David M Tappin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Linda Bauld

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

William Spence

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

[The evidence base of clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessments and patient information as a basis for clinical decision-making].

The external validity of published randomized controlled trials in primary care.

Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: The ACTG 320 trial

Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review.

Randomized controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities?

Generalizability of clinical trials for cannabis dependence to community samples.

External validity of randomised controlled trials in asthma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?

The cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants.

Generalizing results of randomized trials to clinical practice: reliability and cautions.

P2888

s13063-016-1552-5

P304

426

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S13063-016-1552-5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Lesley Sinclair

Barnabas Bessing

P577

2016-08-26T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27565625

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5002204

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Representativeness of the participants in the smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): a cross-sectional study.

about

P2860

P2860

Representativeness of the participants in the smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): a cross-sectional study.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P698

P932