Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology.

Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37272270

about

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.Dependability of results in conference abstracts of randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology and author financial conflicts of interest as a factor associated with full publication.

P2860

Q30274888-2DBE2ABC-CC90-468B-B9A2-C71E24B45DCF Q36836622-639C8390-2F8E-43C1-AC4D-FDD345FF86C3

P2860

Reporting Weaknesses in Conference Abstracts of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Ophthalmology.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37272270

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 08 October 2015

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@en

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@nl

type

label

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@en

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@nl

prefLabel

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@en

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@nl

P1433

Q37272270-5EF75D2B-CD4F-43B1-93EF-F15EB906F5CF

P1476

Q37272270-8BB49ABE-25F3-47C7-AF50-3A32F31C7F85

P2093

Q37272270-44072463-146B-4561-B29A-AA11C1AD1E97

Q37272270-522FBB4B-BBBC-4531-AF5B-4AC8E567ED6E

Q37272270-68102B50-11B3-4BA1-A1EF-4497C863FD8A

Q37272270-AE819A9F-C94E-4D7F-9514-EE558359391D

P2860

Q37272270-47A43B30-535A-4540-8618-2CAB45C6C939

Q37272270-5556892B-746A-4B5B-83B0-FF8A89693B68

Q37272270-59222659-CF1F-42C3-AEF0-66E130099725

Q37272270-5D31B96A-7CDE-4F42-A6D9-6053027E8EDE

Q37272270-86186303-92EB-4FBA-8E45-53E1AD0FEFD0

Q37272270-881EDEAE-F995-4488-8BEE-D576AA6E3065

Q37272270-A0118768-16AE-4088-93D9-F449DB3F1A93

Q37272270-AB73A84B-0237-4CC4-8E79-0B4ACE3D7766

Q37272270-B8AEF48A-693F-48EF-BCEF-FC599D9F572B

Q37272270-C7734A50-BCD0-481A-8438-388867AACA2E

P304

Q37272270-F089CF07-C1FF-4DBE-B963-1A86A159A446

P31

Q37272270-665E0A73-00C7-494D-A857-629BF24B16E6

P356

Q37272270-FFFA8458-B857-4252-B04F-1805EDFA6F9A

P407

Q37272270-93765E71-D984-4ECF-9AF3-B60E700D22D8

P433

Q37272270-F38E459B-6E83-440F-8E29-543AAB66C7A4

P478

Q37272270-04ECFDD6-817E-410C-858A-205C7EB4FD69

P50

Q37272270-32C247B8-C381-4BFC-855E-7816D9FE0F1F

Q37272270-8D50D09B-1481-4ABA-9BB7-A07A088A14C1

Q37272270-D6AE50BE-EAB7-44C2-9F40-89E10B165171

P577

Q37272270-37875BA4-02F3-49B5-A67F-753D08EBA1B9

P698

Q37272270-CF40100C-9500-4123-BFF6-6B9616E67CBE

P921

Q37272270-48e90223-f63a-441b-9a64-15a3305bd8aa

P932

Q37272270-6E66A53E-C797-4627-959D-675C523937BD

P356

JAMAOPHTHALMOL.2015.3577

P1433

JAMA Ophthalmology

P1476

Reporting Weaknesses in Confer ...... racy Studies in Ophthalmology.

@en

P2093

Daniël A Korevaar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kay Dickersin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Maurice W J de Ronde

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patrick M M Bossuyt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of macular oedema in patients with diabetic retinopathy

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.

PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study.

Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.

Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports.

P304

1464-1467

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1001/JAMAOPHTHALMOL.2015.3577

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

12

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

133

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Jérémie F. Cohen

Patrick Bossuyt

P577

2015-10-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

26447954

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

5031079

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string