Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37280934

about

Does a missed obstetric anal sphincter injury at time of delivery affect short-term functional outcome?Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment.

P2860

Q50097499-1177A507-03C4-487A-82BC-EA17DC687CA3 Q52652790-F74CC925-26C6-49D3-8C75-9155C3615E3C

P2860

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37280934

description

article científic

@ca

article scientifique

@fr

articolo scientifico

@it

artigo científico

@pt

bilimsel makale

@tr

scientific article published on 19 February 2016

@en

vedecký článok

@sk

vetenskaplig artikel

@sv

videnskabelig artikel

@da

vědecký článek

@cs

name

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@en

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@nl

type

label

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@en

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@nl

prefLabel

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@en

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@nl

P1433

Q37280934-52D1AB04-FB76-41BE-803A-9BD5A25EE518

P1476

Q37280934-FD1E9D7B-B301-4450-8D51-9E4041FB72F8

P2093

Q37280934-5DDDE23D-AABD-4AE9-A2BF-DBDCAD079862

Q37280934-743D00B4-34F4-4366-9EA4-B3379445FB03

Q37280934-8E9A8E5B-782E-4723-9E11-9DB09CF805BB

Q37280934-BE89A6BB-26D2-47DB-9D5E-AFF320E5EE2E

P275

Q37280934-D93F892E-DAE1-4994-A792-F9D7B4D16C2B

P2860

Q37280934-078EE79B-2476-44C9-97A1-4BA6319DD8A2

Q37280934-0AD7EBAE-DED5-41FB-B2DB-EB889EDA9CEB

Q37280934-0B95427F-B506-4AD3-9DEA-BB71FE99C057

Q37280934-11C01474-299A-4D82-BB35-A6B41391E179

Q37280934-15BB8BB4-47D5-4199-977E-99ABDA58E231

Q37280934-1E4BE759-3F01-41C1-A781-0237FEA0FD42

Q37280934-45BBB478-2D7F-447E-936D-B1F58D4C36CB

Q37280934-46C99C21-04B9-4A8A-8822-D24E4D4C97CB

Q37280934-49932361-08E4-4B52-AE42-C3648971D6B2

Q37280934-5B17D098-4D91-46DA-8BD7-CBF808838A17

P2888

Q37280934-5919F9F3-A0DB-4307-9FFD-3E020A70219F

P304

Q37280934-7D7BA2B7-D916-46DF-B51A-3800A91683BB

P31

Q37280934-00994eb6-4b1c-4bb4-8959-e6a5a1ff1fa6

Q37280934-78411E61-9416-4C54-9500-75F62CCEBEF5

Q37280934-D01A10A0-A458-4A23-A9FB-43039B25786B

P356

Q37280934-DE3970C4-2E75-4B85-9691-4649D7200D0B

P433

Q37280934-B50E7790-6D3D-4193-9890-FBB0CABEBC02

P478

Q37280934-8AA3FCC0-EF97-4BAB-81EB-209ECBE230BB

P577

Q37280934-8BBCFF2D-6214-43AA-ACE8-35748ACF1E5C

Q37280934-A4645D61-800B-43B4-91BD-2CD126F3F75C

P5875

Q37280934-6D338720-DC5E-4D19-912C-6D69E373F038

P698

Q37280934-63055BED-D940-4223-9504-A83CE527F733

P921

Q37280934-25566A19-C972-4B50-A99E-76937A4ACD43

Q37280934-B24406EA-4F3E-40E1-801A-FFB25F97B7F1

Q37280934-BEE07998-7B06-4987-B7D3-DA1E8A6A8E7B

P932

Q37280934-2CF40CAE-EF9A-47BB-92C4-8F04AA2543B3

P356

S00192-016-2956-1

P1433

International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

P1476

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

@en

P2093

Dharmesh S Kapoor

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Pallavi Manish Latthe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rita Champaneria

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tina Sara Verghese

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Episiotomy for vaginal birth

Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

Impact of episiotomy on pelvic floor disorders and their influence on women's wellness after the sixth month postpartum: a retrospective study.

Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)

Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study.

The practice of episiotomy in public hospitals in Hong Kong.

Cutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device, the Episcissors-60.

Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors.

P2888

s00192-016-2956-1

P304

1459-1467

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00192-016-2956-1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

27

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-02-19T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

2016-10-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

295083746

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26894605

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

anatomical region

genitourinary system

P932

5035659

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string