Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
about
Effective public involvement in the HoST-D Programme for dementia home care support: From proposal and design to methods of data collection (innovative practice).Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study.Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.Talking about living and dying with the oldest old: public involvement in a study on end of life care in care homesPrioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experimentThe role of the public in developing interventions: a reflection and critique of a cancer clinical trials unit's model.Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool.Application of a tool for the evaluation of public and patient involvement in research.A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methodsChoosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries.What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials.Capturing Public Opinion on Public Health Topics: A Comparison of Experiences from a Systematic Review, Focus Group Study, and Analysis of Online, User-Generated ContentStakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagementFacilitating comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics: evaluating stakeholder perceptions of the engagement processValues associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review.Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation.What can we learn from trial decliners about improving recruitment? Qualitative study.The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trialCulturally-adapted Family Intervention (CaFI) for African-Caribbeans diagnosed with schizophrenia and their families: a feasibility study protocol of implementation and acceptability.Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.Involving patients in research: considering good practice.Alzheimer Europe's position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (patient and public involvement).Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process.Addressing Deficits and Injustices: The Potential Epistemic Contributions of Patients to Research.Service user involvement in research may lead to contrary rather than collaborative accounts: findings from a qualitative palliative care study.Introducing this issue.Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare.Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.Preparing researchers for patient and public involvement in scientific research: Development of a hands-on learning approach through action research.From tokenism to meaningful engagement: best practices in patient involvement in an EU project.Involving the public in epidemiological public health research: a qualitative study of public and stakeholder involvement in evaluation of a population-wide natural policy experiment.Older people's priorities in health and social care research and practice: a public engagement workshop.Methods to identify and prioritize patient-centered outcomes for use in comparative effectiveness researchReflecting on Education for Sustainable Development through Two Lenses: Ability Studies and Disability Studies
P2860
Q31153970-C1CF21B0-F62D-4D0B-8FF0-6A9E09CFE54FQ33693207-F7293382-361C-42E3-8332-E496133A7602Q33795905-1101C37C-2F1B-4535-905E-C3457A37F0E9Q34082234-E04B1DD5-DC8D-429C-8B55-825BEE36A61CQ34199406-C699FD67-D634-4F7B-B124-338BAF6526E0Q34482437-787901C6-BCB4-4F7C-A825-E4446374725FQ34940074-1E684969-2AFF-49EC-93BE-6AD8D24230FCQ35179651-1CD2E8F0-2FF2-4B95-BB73-CA44810C699EQ35225654-CE94DED1-EE83-4010-B8E3-8EC26C1DB766Q35604461-9A1D65BB-1A3A-4D4C-B164-379EC5C49DF3Q35656310-CC60FC4B-3893-4BB5-9922-74B972A7C969Q35989083-CB5A7DAB-F231-41FE-B83E-E5EBCF7F7823Q36021512-7A13F9A4-40B6-424C-9B23-BEE55ABA9D27Q36641488-645E46F1-B0EC-40B0-BE41-130D3F217BF3Q37333429-A0DC17B8-4423-4566-8E18-D4F9A2038018Q37333634-09EEF6DC-7973-4367-8A87-DD5E148A5DBCQ37336782-5B52DF12-960C-4284-8A23-E19365FB82ABQ37487922-9A746E95-5139-40FC-9359-088E1B4D79DDQ37498619-CACB1128-743E-4C78-A190-A805AAAB118FQ37516837-288D36C4-3EC6-4E38-A70C-B4B48617F0D1Q37570573-FF2470F1-539A-4D6F-8E4C-1C32D42A0351Q38370760-28DB2934-75F9-4B7D-8648-322D78BB9081Q38397151-A8D15E01-8A4D-4ED5-8DE4-C24C0ADF910FQ39375846-CF3D7379-D4E0-4502-A805-54741E998A2EQ39699323-AEAA27EE-9036-401C-93E2-9A65AA005476Q40187163-B0312F72-2FC1-4EEA-A1CC-2530230B6EDDQ42384116-549B952F-250B-466F-B344-D90707C86C32Q42700578-6A28A6B4-48AC-4CE6-A3C8-3C5DB26E1FD2Q47791641-D95645C6-82E0-4C10-8647-51575B2D29ECQ49255675-D13CA380-8039-43A1-8E72-FEAE0F7218D5Q50107640-3A318D97-EE13-4422-9301-9443A39DF21EQ51101142-E16ABFC1-33F2-45A3-AF36-571E90140806Q55014562-701E4EBC-E457-4FF0-9418-6414E22FE1E2Q55048716-00F30729-9D89-4EFE-AFE1-57653F106091Q57516893-FC44493C-9BA8-491D-AF1C-B98D15AEC86EQ58077430-7D6524B0-DCB4-4A21-82C6-0FD1486E6CA9
P2860
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 17 February 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@en
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@nl
type
label
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@en
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@nl
prefLabel
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@en
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.
@en
P2093
Cindy L Cooper
Glenys D Parry
Jonathan D Boote
Philippa Yeeles
Rosemary Barber
Sarah Cook
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1369-7625.2010.00660.X
P577
2011-02-17T00:00:00Z